From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 16:52:31 +0100 From: Gilles Chanteperdrix Message-ID: <20150123155231.GD9521@hermes.click-hack.org> References: <129277905.Ag2XebZWbK@soho> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <129277905.Ag2XebZWbK@soho> Subject: Re: [Xenomai] Packaging Xenomai-3 List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 01:09:41PM +0100, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > Hi, > > now that I have some kernel to boot, I would like to ask some aspects of > Xenomai-3 in order to package it. > > Reading the documentation, now the new libxenomai could use two kind of > kernels: the patched one (Cobalt) or the preempt_rt (Mercury). a preempt_rt kernel is a patched kernel too. > > 1) Is it possible to have _only_ one library (binary) that uses one or another > kernel in function which is running? No, you could want to run a kernel with both patches. So basing the decision on which patch you are running does not make sense. -- Gilles.