All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Resolved...ish.  was: Re: spurious I/O errors from btrfs...at the caching layer?
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 23:22:33 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150126042233.GC15935@hungrycats.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150125165035.GA15935@hungrycats.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1928 bytes --]

It seems that the rate of spurious I/O errors varies most according to
the vm.vfs_cache_pressure sysctl.  At '10' the I/O errors occur so often
that building a kernel is impossible.  At '100' I can't reproduce even
a single I/O error.

I guess this is own my fault for using non-default sysctl parameters,
although I wouldn't expect any value of this sysctl to cause these
symptoms... :-P


On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 11:50:36AM -0500, Zygo Blaxell wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 01:06:01PM -0500, Zygo Blaxell wrote:
> > I am seeing a lot of spurious I/O errors that look like they come from
> > the cache-facing side of btrfs.  While running a heavy load with some
> > extent-sharing (e.g. building 20 Linux kernels at once from source trees
> > copied with 'cp -a --reflink=always'), some files will return spurious
> > EIO on read.  It happens often enough to prevent a Linux kernel build
> > about 1/3 of the time.
> [...]
> > Observed from 3.17..3.18.3.  All filesystems affected use skinny-metadata.
> > No filesystems that are not using skinny-metadata seem to have this
> > problem.
> 
> I ran a test overnight using 3.18.3 on a freshly formatted filesystem with
> no skinny-metadata.
> 
> The test consisted of creating reflink copies of a Linux kernel source
> tree and running kernel builds in each copy simultaneously, like this:
> 
> 	# assume you have a ready-to-build kernel tree in 'linux'
> 	for x in $(seq 1 5); do
> 		cp -a --reflink linux linux-$x
> 	done
> 
> 	# build all the kernels at once
> 	for x in $(seq 1 5); do
> 		(cd linux-$x && make -j10 2>&1 | tee make.log) &
> 	done
> 
> 	wait
> 	# then tail all the make.logs and see how many failed due to
> 	# I/O errors
> 
> Spurious I/O errors occured with as few as two concurrent kernel builds.
> 
> The test machine has 16GB of RAM and the filesystem is also 16GB,
> RAID1 on two spinning disks.
> 



[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-26  4:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-24 18:06 spuious I/O errors from btrfs...at the caching layer? Zygo Blaxell
2015-01-25 16:50 ` Zygo Blaxell
2015-01-26  4:22   ` Zygo Blaxell [this message]
2015-01-26 12:39     ` Resolved...ish. was: Re: spurious " Austin S Hemmelgarn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150126042233.GC15935@hungrycats.org \
    --to=ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.