From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Allison Subject: Re: Re: The patents and license issue from microsoft regarding SMB implementation(GPL) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:32:41 -0800 Message-ID: <20150128223241.GA20885@samba2> References: <000801d03aa1$92475b40$b6d611c0$@samsung.com> <1422454054.32747.35.camel@samba.org> Reply-To: Jeremy Allison Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Simo , Namjae Jeon , samba-technical@lists.samba.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org To: support@remsnet.de Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: samba-technical-bounces@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-technical-bounces@lists.samba.org List-Id: linux-cifs.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 08:36:04PM +0100, support@remsnet.de wrote: > > legal : maybe - without sign patent licenses agreements : allmost not. > ... > - M$ owns most of the smb Protokoll patents as they developed them.. > ... > CIFS is m$ in clear words SMB protocoll based. > Therefore fall under the M$ license rules . In case anyone is worrying, the above is just wrong. See here: https://www.samba.org/samba/PFIF/ and here: https://www.samba.org/samba/PFIF/PFIF_agreement.html for details. Jeremy.