All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
	Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] HID: i2c-hid: The interrupt should be level sensitive
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 15:09:50 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150129200950.GC27265@mail.corp.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1422282573-18215-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

On Jan 26 2015 or thereabouts, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> The Microsoft HID over I2C specification says two things regarding the
> interrupt:
> 
>  1) The interrupt should be level sensitive
>  2) The device keeps the interrupt asserted as long as it has more reports
>     available.
> 
> We've seen that at least some Atmel and N-Trig panels keep the line low as
> long as they have something to send. The current version of the driver only
> detects the first edge but then fails to read rest of the reports (as the
> line is still asserted).
> 
> Make the driver follow the specification and configure the HID interrupt to
> be level sensitive.
> 
> The Windows HID over I2C driver also seems to do the same.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
> ---

FWIW, this one is
Acked-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>

looks like we are going to drop 2/2, but this one is still valid.

Cheers,
Benjamin

>  drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c b/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c
> index d43e967e7533..8f1dfc5c5d9c 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c
> @@ -785,7 +785,7 @@ static int i2c_hid_init_irq(struct i2c_client *client)
>  	dev_dbg(&client->dev, "Requesting IRQ: %d\n", client->irq);
>  
>  	ret = request_threaded_irq(client->irq, NULL, i2c_hid_irq,
> -			IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING | IRQF_ONESHOT,
> +			IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW | IRQF_ONESHOT,
>  			client->name, ihid);
>  	if (ret < 0) {
>  		dev_warn(&client->dev,
> -- 
> 2.1.4
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-01-29 20:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-26 14:29 [PATCH 1/2] HID: i2c-hid: The interrupt should be level sensitive Mika Westerberg
2015-01-26 14:29 ` [PATCH 2/2] HID: i2c-hid: Add support for GPIO interrupts Mika Westerberg
2015-01-26 14:37   ` Mark Rutland
2015-01-26 14:47     ` Mika Westerberg
2015-01-26 14:50       ` Mark Rutland
2015-01-26 15:16         ` Mika Westerberg
2015-01-26 16:01           ` Mark Rutland
2015-01-26 16:13             ` Mika Westerberg
2015-01-26 16:39               ` Mark Rutland
2015-01-27 10:16                 ` Mika Westerberg
2015-01-27 10:39                   ` Mark Rutland
2015-01-27 10:59                     ` Mika Westerberg
2015-01-27 11:14                       ` Mark Rutland
2015-01-27 11:30                         ` Mika Westerberg
2015-01-27 14:33                           ` Mark Rutland
2015-01-27 14:41                             ` Mika Westerberg
2015-01-27 15:06                               ` Mark Rutland
2015-01-27 15:21                                 ` Mika Westerberg
2015-01-27 15:57                                   ` Mark Rutland
2015-01-27 17:10                                     ` Mika Westerberg
2015-01-29 20:09 ` Benjamin Tissoires [this message]
2015-02-17 12:24   ` [PATCH 1/2] HID: i2c-hid: The interrupt should be level sensitive Jiri Kosina

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150129200950.GC27265@mail.corp.redhat.com \
    --to=benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
    --cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
    --cc=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.