All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Subject: Re: powerpc/book3s: Fix the MCE code to use CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_HV_POSSIBLE
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 17:17:04 +1100 (AEDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150130061704.EE8C21402BA@ozlabs.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150107044237.5803.85825.stgit@mars.in.ibm.com>

On Wed, 2015-07-01 at 04:43:07 UTC, Mahesh Salgaonkar wrote:
> From: Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> commit id 9975f5e added new config variable CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_HV_POSSIBLE
> that helps to select the relevant code in the kernel when HV and PR
> bits are built as separate modules. As part of that commit, all the
> instances of #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_64_HV was replaced with
> CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_HV_POSSIBLE. But the MCE code still depends on
> CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_64_HV which is wrong. When HV bits are built as a
> separate module the relevent MCE code gets excluded. This patch fixes
> the MCE code to use CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_HV_POSSIBLE.

So what is the symptom? ie. is it fatal or just annoying.

And depending on that, should this go to stable?

cheers

      parent reply	other threads:[~2015-01-30  6:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-07  4:43 [PATCH] powerpc/book3s: Fix the MCE code to use CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_HV_POSSIBLE Mahesh J Salgaonkar
2015-01-07  8:16 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2015-01-08  5:28   ` Mahesh Jagannath Salgaonkar
2015-01-30  6:17 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150130061704.EE8C21402BA@ozlabs.org \
    --to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.