All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	namhyung@kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH perf/core 1/2] [BUGFIX] perf-probe: Fix to handle optimized not-inlined but has no instance
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 11:32:20 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150130143220.GB3101@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150130142135.GA3101@kernel.org>

Em Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 11:21:35AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 06:37:44PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
> > Fix to handle optimized no-inline functions which have
> > only function definition but no actual instance at
> > that point. To fix this problem, we need to find actual
> > instance of the function.
> > 
> > Without this patch:
> >   ----
> >   # perf probe -a __up
> >   Failed to get entry address of __up.
> >     Error: Failed to add events.
> >   # perf probe -L __up
> >   Specified source line is not found.
> >     Error: Failed to show lines.
> >   ----
> > 
> > With this patch:
> >   ----
> >   # perf probe -a __up
> >   Added new event:
> >     probe:__up           (on __up)
> > 
> >   You can now use it in all perf tools, such as:
> > 
> >           perf record -e probe:__up -aR sleep 1
> > 
> >   # perf probe -L __up
> >   <__up@/home/fedora/ksrc/linux-3/kernel/locking/semaphore.c:0>
> >         0  static noinline void __sched __up(struct semaphore *sem)
> >            {
> >                   struct semaphore_waiter *waiter = list_first_entry(&sem->wait_
> >                                                           struct semaphore_waite
> >         4         list_del(&waiter->list);
> >         5         waiter->up = true;
> >         6         wake_up_process(waiter->task);
> >         7  }
> >   ----
> 
> Since __up here was built in some other way, I looked for another

Nah, I saw you trying to add "perf probe -a __up" and stopped there,
hadn't seen that it fails _as well_ for just listing the source code...

Yes, I managed to reproduce the problem and test your fix, it works:

  [root@zoo ~]# perf probe --del __up
  Removed event: probe:__up
  [root@zoo ~]# perf probe -L __up
  Specified source line is not found.
    Error: Failed to show lines.

---->>>>>> APPLY THE PATCH, rebuild and try again:

  [root@zoo ~]# 
  [root@zoo ~]# perf probe -L __up
  <__up@/home/git/linux/kernel/locking/semaphore.c:0>
        0  static noinline void __sched __up(struct semaphore *sem)
           {
                  struct semaphore_waiter *waiter = list_first_entry(&sem->wait_list,
                                                          struct semaphore_waiter, list);
        4         list_del(&waiter->list);
        5         waiter->up = true;
        6         wake_up_process(waiter->task);
        7  }
  [root@zoo ~]#

--------------------------------------------------------------

So its just this other case that fails, vmalloc_fault, can you check
this one? Does it happen in your machine as well?

Applying your patch, thanks,

- Arnaldo

> 'noinline' function to try, and it failed here:
> 
>   [root@zoo ~]# perf probe -L vmalloc_fault | head -5
>   <vmalloc_fault@/home/git/linux/arch/x86/mm/fault.c:0>
>         0  static noinline int vmalloc_fault(unsigned long address)
>         1  {
>            	pgd_t *pgd, *pgd_ref;
>            	pud_t *pud, *pud_ref;
>   [root@zoo ~]# perf probe vmalloc_fault
>   Added new event:
>   Failed to write event: Invalid argument
>     Error: Failed to add events.
> 
> ---->>>>>> APPLY THE PATCH, rebuild and try again:
> 
>   [root@zoo ~]# perf probe vmalloc_fault
>   Added new event:
>   Failed to write event: Invalid argument
>     Error: Failed to add events.
>   [root@zoo ~]# perf probe -v vmalloc_fault
>   probe-definition(0): vmalloc_fault 
>   symbol:vmalloc_fault file:(null) line:0 offset:0 return:0 lazy:(null)
>   0 arguments
>   Looking at the vmlinux_path (7 entries long)
>   Using /lib/modules/3.19.0-rc6+/build/vmlinux for symbols
>   Open Debuginfo file: /lib/modules/3.19.0-rc6+/build/vmlinux
>   Try to find probe point from debuginfo.
>   Probe point found: vmalloc_fault+0
>   Found 1 probe_trace_events.
>   Opening /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/kprobe_events write=1
>   Added new event:
>   Writing event: p:probe/vmalloc_fault _text+289600
>   Failed to write event: Invalid argument
>     Error: Failed to add events. Reason: Invalid argument (Code: -22)
>   [root@zoo ~]# grep -w vmalloc_fault /proc/kallsyms
>   ffffffff81046b40 t vmalloc_fault
>   [root@zoo ~]# grep -w _text /proc/kallsyms 
>   ffffffff81000000 T _text
>   [root@zoo ~]# python 
>   Python 2.7.5 (default, Nov  3 2014, 14:26:24) 
>   [GCC 4.8.3 20140911 (Red Hat 4.8.3-7)] on linux2
>   Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>   >>> 0xffffffff81046b40 - 0xffffffff81000000
>   289600L
>   >>> 
>   [root@zoo ~]# readelf -s /lib/modules/3.19.0-rc6+/build/vmlinux | egrep -w _text\|vmalloc_fault
>     3499: ffffffff81046b40   410 FUNC    LOCAL  DEFAULT    1 vmalloc_fault
>    48873: ffffffff81000000     0 NOTYPE  GLOBAL DEFAULT    1 _text
>   [root@zoo ~]# 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> So perhaps I need a 'noinline' _and_ '__sched', so that I have a "optimized
> no-inline functions which have only function definition but no actual instance
> at that point"?
> 
> Looking for one, will post here after objdump -dS finishes...
> 
> - Arnaldo

  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-30 14:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-30  9:37 [PATCH perf/core 0/2] perf-probe: bugfix and update Masami Hiramatsu
2015-01-30  9:37 ` [PATCH perf/core 1/2] [BUGFIX] perf-probe: Fix to handle optimized not-inlined but has no instance Masami Hiramatsu
2015-01-30 14:21   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-01-30 14:32     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2015-02-02  8:41       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2015-02-08  8:37     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2015-02-11 20:42       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-02-19 14:31         ` [PATCH perf/core ] perf-probe: Check kprobes blacklist when adding new events Masami Hiramatsu
2015-02-25 21:50           ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-02-28  9:30           ` [tip:perf/core] perf probe: " tip-bot for Masami Hiramatsu
2015-02-18 18:25   ` [tip:perf/core] perf probe: Fix to handle optimized not-inlined functions tip-bot for Masami Hiramatsu
2015-01-30  9:37 ` [PATCH perf/core 2/2] [DOC] perf-probe: Update perf-probe document Masami Hiramatsu
2015-02-18 18:25   ` [tip:perf/core] perf probe: Update man page tip-bot for Masami Hiramatsu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150130143220.GB3101@kernel.org \
    --to=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.