From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:44324 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751489AbbBBO4X (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Feb 2015 09:56:23 -0500 Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 15:56:19 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: "J. Bruce Fields" Cc: Jeff Layton , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/20] nfsd: implement pNFS operations Message-ID: <20150202145619.GA18387@lst.de> References: <1421925006-24231-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <1421925006-24231-11-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <20150129203346.GA11064@fieldses.org> <20150202124349.GA15598@lst.de> <20150202142832.GC22301@fieldses.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20150202142832.GC22301@fieldses.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 09:28:32AM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > I didn't notice anything that looked like a big problem to me, so absent > any objections I'll commit the revised versions for 3.20 once we figure > out how to handle the xfs stuff. Do you want the resend to be on top of Jeffs locks tree, or do you want me to be based just on the nfsd changes, which would require a fairly trivial merge once both of the trees hit mainline? From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 400837FCD for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 08:56:24 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE60DAC002 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 06:56:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from newverein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id yvtGnOE1kTaPuwkT (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 06:56:22 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 15:56:19 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/20] nfsd: implement pNFS operations Message-ID: <20150202145619.GA18387@lst.de> References: <1421925006-24231-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <1421925006-24231-11-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <20150129203346.GA11064@fieldses.org> <20150202124349.GA15598@lst.de> <20150202142832.GC22301@fieldses.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150202142832.GC22301@fieldses.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: "J. Bruce Fields" Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Layton , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 09:28:32AM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > I didn't notice anything that looked like a big problem to me, so absent > any objections I'll commit the revised versions for 3.20 once we figure > out how to handle the xfs stuff. Do you want the resend to be on top of Jeffs locks tree, or do you want me to be based just on the nfsd changes, which would require a fairly trivial merge once both of the trees hit mainline? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/20] nfsd: implement pNFS operations Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 15:56:19 +0100 Message-ID: <20150202145619.GA18387@lst.de> References: <1421925006-24231-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <1421925006-24231-11-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <20150129203346.GA11064@fieldses.org> <20150202124349.GA15598@lst.de> <20150202142832.GC22301@fieldses.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jeff Layton , linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, xfs-VZNHf3L845pBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org To: "J. Bruce Fields" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150202142832.GC22301-uC3wQj2KruNg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 09:28:32AM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > I didn't notice anything that looked like a big problem to me, so absent > any objections I'll commit the revised versions for 3.20 once we figure > out how to handle the xfs stuff. Do you want the resend to be on top of Jeffs locks tree, or do you want me to be based just on the nfsd changes, which would require a fairly trivial merge once both of the trees hit mainline? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html