All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>,
	Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>,
	linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kernel-rt rcuc lock contention problem
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 21:55:46 -0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150203235546.GA10082@amt.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150203153619.6bf35329@gandalf.local.home>

On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 03:36:19PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Feb 2015 19:02:29 -0200
> Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > I am worried about two things:
> > 
> > 1) Something calling raise_softirq(TIMER_SOFTIRQ) and lack of 
> > Paul's d550e81dc0dd.
> > 
> > The result is __run_timers checking all timer wheel "nodes" 
> > and updating base->timer_jiffies, latency is ruined.
> > 
> > Even if one carefully made sure no timer is present.
> > 
> > 2) Reliance on sched timer interrupt to raise timer softirq 
> > in case of pending irq work (your patch) AND no_hz_full.
> > 
> > > Isolation is the *only* way to make that work.
> > 
> > Fine. Please see item 1) above.
> > 
> 
> So basically you are saying we just need: d550e81dc0dd ?

For 1), the 4 patches he mentioned, please.

For 2), it was just a hypothesis (perhaps fuelled  by the fact 
the my test box crashes with nohz_full= and isolated cpus).


      parent reply	other threads:[~2015-02-03 23:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-26 19:14 kernel-rt rcuc lock contention problem Luiz Capitulino
2015-01-27 20:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-28  1:55   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2015-01-28 14:18     ` Luiz Capitulino
2015-01-28 18:09       ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-28 18:39         ` Luiz Capitulino
2015-01-28 19:00           ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-28 19:06             ` Luiz Capitulino
2015-01-28 18:03     ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-28 18:25       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2015-01-28 18:55         ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-29 17:06           ` Steven Rostedt
2015-01-29 18:11             ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-29 18:13           ` Marcelo Tosatti
2015-01-29 18:36             ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-02 18:24           ` Marcelo Tosatti
2015-02-02 20:35             ` Steven Rostedt
2015-02-02 20:46               ` Marcelo Tosatti
2015-02-02 20:55                 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-02-02 21:02                   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2015-02-03 20:36                     ` Steven Rostedt
2015-02-03 20:57                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-03 23:55                       ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150203235546.GA10082@amt.cnet \
    --to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=srostedt@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.