From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932610AbbBDADA (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Feb 2015 19:03:00 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:56252 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753120AbbBDAC7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Feb 2015 19:02:59 -0500 Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 16:02:58 -0800 From: Greg KH To: KY Srinivasan Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "devel@linuxdriverproject.org" , "olaf@aepfle.de" , "apw@canonical.com" , "vkuznets@redhat.com" , "tglx@linutronix.de" Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND V2 0/8] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Enable unloading of vmbus driver Message-ID: <20150204000258.GA24299@kroah.com> References: <1422492560-24971-1-git-send-email-kys@microsoft.com> <20150203234634.GA24480@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 11:57:18PM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@linuxfoundation.org] > > Sent: Tuesday, February 3, 2015 3:47 PM > > To: KY Srinivasan > > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; devel@linuxdriverproject.org; > > olaf@aepfle.de; apw@canonical.com; vkuznets@redhat.com; > > tglx@linutronix.de > > Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND V2 0/8] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Enable unloading of > > vmbus driver > > > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 04:49:20PM -0800, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote: > > > Windows hosts starting with Ws2012 R2 permit re-establishing the vmbus > > > connection from the guest. This patch-set includes patches from Vitaly > > > to cleanup the VMBUS unload path so we can potentially reload the driver. > > > > > > This set also includes a patch from Jake to correctly extract MMIO > > > information on both Gen1 and Gen 2 firmware. > > > > What changed from v1 of this series? > > > > Please refresh your patch series and send _all_ patches that need to be > > applied, I see 2 different series, and a few random patches sent out, with no > > specific order, so I don't know what to do here :( > > > Ok; I will resend the entire set. Do you want me to keep the RESEND tag. If you use the "vX" numbering scheme, it doesn't make much sense, right? thanks, greg k-h