diff for duplicates of <20150204113305.GA28902@arm.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index cdbce84..0d73884 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 08:10:02PM +0000, Mitchel Humpherys wrote: -> On Wed, Jan 28 2015 at 04:07:39 AM, Will Deacon <will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org> wrote: +> On Wed, Jan 28 2015 at 04:07:39 AM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote: > > With a shared handler (e.g. a bunch of context banks have the same IRQ) > > then I assume that we don't want to end up with multiple handler threads > > all tripping over each other. I'd rather have one thread that handles work diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index e5a89b9..4561b25 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -3,17 +3,14 @@ "ref\0vnkw61bx2klr.fsf@mitchelh-linux.qualcomm.com\0" "ref\020150128120738.GJ1569@arm.com\0" "ref\0vnkwa90why79.fsf@mitchelh-linux.qualcomm.com\0" - "ref\0vnkwa90why79.fsf-Yf+dfxj6toJBVvN7MMdr1KRtKmQZhJ7pQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org\0" - "From\0Will Deacon <will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>\0" - "Subject\0Re: [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu: use a threaded handler for context interrupts\0" + "From\0will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)\0" + "Subject\0[PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu: use a threaded handler for context interrupts\0" "Date\0Wed, 4 Feb 2015 11:33:05 +0000\0" - "To\0Mitchel Humpherys <mitchelh-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>\0" - "Cc\0iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org <iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org>" - " linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org <linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>\0" + "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 08:10:02PM +0000, Mitchel Humpherys wrote:\n" - "> On Wed, Jan 28 2015 at 04:07:39 AM, Will Deacon <will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org> wrote:\n" + "> On Wed, Jan 28 2015 at 04:07:39 AM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:\n" "> > With a shared handler (e.g. a bunch of context banks have the same IRQ)\n" "> > then I assume that we don't want to end up with multiple handler threads\n" "> > all tripping over each other. I'd rather have one thread that handles work\n" @@ -45,4 +42,4 @@ "\n" Will -afad88944daeedb7b3cd693abb6101b239c9be267be9d7dab2d8b8d32fad7186 +b2af732d586c8825a5a081aef2063435fa84e1c8d8174c8e5257d0aafb9d5b60
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.