From: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>
To: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] time, ntp: Do not update time_state in middle of leap
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 17:30:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150204163005.GF26460@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1423052928-21052-1-git-send-email-prarit@redhat.com>
Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> While this is highly unlikely to ever happen in the real world it is
> still something we should protect against, as breaking the state machine
> is obviously bad.
I'm not sure what exactly breaks here. If the PLL is disabled before
time_state is set to TIME_OOP, the insertion/deletion will be aborted.
If after that, adjtimex() will return with TIME_ERROR as expected, or
not?
> static inline void process_adj_status(struct timex *txc, struct timespec64 *ts)
> {
> - if ((time_status & STA_PLL) && !(txc->status & STA_PLL)) {
> + if ((time_status & STA_PLL) && !(txc->status & STA_PLL) &&
> + (time_state != TIME_OOP)) {
> time_state = TIME_OK;
> time_status = STA_UNSYNC;
> /* restart PPS frequency calibration */
Shouldn't be time_status reset and the PPS calibration restarted even
when state is TIME_OOP?
--
Miroslav Lichvar
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-04 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-04 12:28 [PATCH] time, ntp: Do not update time_state in middle of leap second Prarit Bhargava
2015-02-04 16:30 ` Miroslav Lichvar [this message]
2015-02-05 13:20 ` [PATCH] time, ntp: Do not update time_state in middle of leap Prarit Bhargava
2015-02-06 10:38 ` Miroslav Lichvar
2015-02-06 10:50 ` Prarit Bhargava
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150204163005.GF26460@localhost \
--to=mlichvar@redhat.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.