From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>,
Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrey Ryabinin <a.ryabinin@samsung.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: sched: memory corruption on completing completions
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 08:10:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150205071032.GA3114@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFwJcG0eAzFJEKD0KVKF2vug-pQpZcoboue9D9SdarsjoQ@mail.gmail.com>
* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> [...]
>
> As usual, the paravirt code is a horribly buggy heap of crud.
> Film at 11.
>
> Why did I think we had this bug but already fixed it ? Maybe
> it's one of those things that Waiman fixed in his long delayed
> qspinlock series? Waiman? Or maybe I just remember the fixes
> where we changed from a mutex to a spinlock, which fixed a very
> similar case for non-paravirtualized cases.
We definitely had such a high profile bug in the native case,
years before the qspinlock series came along. I don't remember
the specifics anymore, but maybe it was in the VFS code?
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-05 7:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-04 23:24 sched: memory corruption on completing completions Sasha Levin
2015-02-04 23:46 ` Andrew Morton
2015-02-05 0:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-02-05 7:10 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2015-02-05 9:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-05 20:44 ` Sasha Levin
2015-02-05 20:59 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-02-05 21:02 ` Sasha Levin
2015-02-05 21:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-02-05 22:37 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-02-05 22:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-02-06 6:48 ` Raghavendra K T
2015-02-06 15:00 ` Raghavendra K T
2015-02-06 12:29 ` Raghavendra K T
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150205071032.GA3114@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=Waiman.Long@hp.com \
--cc=a.ryabinin@samsung.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.