From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Euan Harris <euan.harris@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools: work around collision of -O0 and
	-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 15:47:53 +0000
Message-ID: <20150205154753.GF3823@citrix.com>
References: <54D25E95020000780005CFD8@mail.emea.novell.com>
	<21715.20257.88376.581397@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
	<54D35F85020000780005D36C@mail.emea.novell.com>
	<21715.35720.456332.832317@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39])
	by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <euan.harris@citrix.com>) id 1YJOew-0002L5-Et
	for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2015 15:48:02 +0000
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <21715.35720.456332.832317@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@eu.citrix.com>, xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 03:26:00PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [PATCH] tools: work around collision of -O0 and -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE"):
> > For one, PY_XCFLAGS='' wouldn't help, as we get -O0 from the
> > incoming CFLAGS.
> 
> Sorry, I meant PY_XCFLAGS='' or -O1 (as appropriate).
> 
> > And then I'm not really intending to fiddle with
> > the configure scripts (albeit, having done the patch in the presented
> > form, I expected you to want it done that way) - this and alike is
> > what I specifically want to stay out of if at all possible. Since in any
> > event commit 1166ecf781 introduced a regression for multiple
> > people, perhaps if that is not supposed to be reverted Euan should
> > look into addressing that regression?
> 
> Since I'm being difficult, how about if I prepare patch to configure.
> Would you be able to test it ?

If it's not too much trouble, I'd be very grateful if you could do this.
My autotools knowledge is rusty, and I don't know when I'll have the 
opportunity to set up a machine which reproduces the problem (clearly
mine doesn't, otherwise I would have run into this problem before!)

Thanks,
Euan