From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vinod Koul Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: Intel: fix sst firmware path Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 11:26:13 -0800 Message-ID: <20150205192613.GA16547@intel.com> References: <1423078507-30032-1-git-send-email-kevin.strasser@linux.intel.com> <20150205181458.GG21293@sirena.org.uk> <20150205184822.GE13647@H87M> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150205184822.GE13647@H87M> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Kevin Strasser Cc: Mark Brown , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Mengdong Lin , Liam Girdwood , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yang Fang List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 10:48:22AM -0800, Kevin Strasser wrote: > On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 06:14:58PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 11:35:07AM -0800, Kevin Strasser wrote: > > > All sst firmware is provided under the intel directory of the linux-firmware > > > tree. By default this directory structure is kept when installing on a > > > target system. Change the path to expect a default linux-firmware > > > installation. > > > > Applied, thanks. It doesn't apply as a fix but that seems to be OK as the > > only request_firmware() I spotted there appears to use intel/ prefixed > > directories already. > > I'm a little confused. Do you want me to submit a version that can be applied as > a fix? It seems to me that we want this patch in 3.19. This patch wont apply as is, Mark requires you need to provide a patch which can be applied against 3.19 -- ~Vinod