From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alnovak@suse.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: irq: Check for valid irq descriptor in check_irq_vectors_for_cpu_disable
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 13:28:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150206122802.GT3702@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54D304DE.90506@linux.intel.com>
Hi Jiang,
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 01:51:26PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
> Reviewed-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Thanks for your review.
> Actually there's another racing pattern.
> for (irq = 0; irq < nr_irqs; irq++) {
> desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
> access desc->xxx
> }
>
> When sparsing IRQ is enabled, there's no mechanism to protect
> desc returned by irq_to_desc(). Once I have considered a brute
> solution of disabling freeing of irq_desc:(
Hmm, how about wrapping the places that use irq_desc in rcu_read_lock()
and do a synchronize_rcu() before we free it (at least in the SPARSE_IRQ
case)? It wouldn't be a real RCU data structure, but we make at least
sure that we don't free an irq_desc thats in use.
Joerg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-06 12:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-04 13:27 [PATCH] x86: irq: Check for valid irq descriptor in check_irq_vectors_for_cpu_disable Joerg Roedel
2015-02-05 5:51 ` Jiang Liu
2015-02-06 12:28 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2015-02-18 17:08 ` [tip:irq/urgent] x86/irq: Check for valid irq descriptor in check_irq_vectors_for_cpu_disable() tip-bot for Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150206122802.GT3702@8bytes.org \
--to=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=alnovak@suse.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.