From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
<stable@vger.kernel.org>, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] x86/tlb/trace: Do not trace on CPU that is offline
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 19:58:19 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150208005937.566738686@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20150208005817.037067701@goodmis.org
[-- Attachment #1: 0002-x86-tlb-trace-Do-not-trace-on-CPU-that-is-offline.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3066 bytes --]
From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
When taking a CPU down for suspend and resume, a tracepoint may be called
when the CPU has been designated offline. As tracepoints require RCU for
protection, they must not be called if the current CPU is offline.
Unfortunately, trace_tlb_flush() is called in this scenario as was noted
by LOCKDEP:
...
Disabling non-boot CPUs ...
intel_pstate CPU 1 exiting
===============================
smpboot: CPU 1 didn't die...
[ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
3.19.0-rc7-next-20150204.1-iniza-small #1 Not tainted
-------------------------------
include/trace/events/tlb.h:35 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
other info that might help us debug this:
RCU used illegally from offline CPU!
rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 0
no locks held by swapper/1/0.
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 3.19.0-rc7-next-20150204.1-iniza-small #1
Hardware name: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. 530U3BI/530U4BI/530U4BH/530U3BI/530U4BI/530U4BH, BIOS 13XK 03/28/2013
0000000000000001 ffff88011a44fe18 ffffffff817e370d 0000000000000011
ffff88011a448290 ffff88011a44fe48 ffffffff810d6847 ffff8800c66b9600
0000000000000001 ffff88011a44c000 ffffffff81cb3900 ffff88011a44fe78
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff817e370d>] dump_stack+0x4c/0x65
[<ffffffff810d6847>] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0xe7/0x120
[<ffffffff810b71a5>] idle_task_exit+0x205/0x2c0
[<ffffffff81054c4e>] play_dead_common+0xe/0x50
[<ffffffff81054ca5>] native_play_dead+0x15/0x140
[<ffffffff8102963f>] arch_cpu_idle_dead+0xf/0x20
[<ffffffff810cd89e>] cpu_startup_entry+0x37e/0x580
[<ffffffff81053e20>] start_secondary+0x140/0x150
intel_pstate CPU 2 exiting
...
By converting the tlb_flush tracepoint to a TRACE_EVENT_CONDITION where the
condition is cpu_online(smp_processor_id()), we can avoid calling RCU protected
code when the CPU is offline.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+icZUUGiGDoL5NU8RuxKzFjoLjEKRtUWx=JB8B9a0EQv-eGzQ@mail.gmail.com
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.17+
Fixes: d17d8f9dedb9 "x86/mm: Add tracepoints for TLB flushes"
Reported-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
include/trace/events/tlb.h | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/trace/events/tlb.h b/include/trace/events/tlb.h
index 13391d288107..0e7635765153 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/tlb.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/tlb.h
@@ -13,11 +13,13 @@
{ TLB_LOCAL_SHOOTDOWN, "local shootdown" }, \
{ TLB_LOCAL_MM_SHOOTDOWN, "local mm shootdown" }
-TRACE_EVENT(tlb_flush,
+TRACE_EVENT_CONDITION(tlb_flush,
TP_PROTO(int reason, unsigned long pages),
TP_ARGS(reason, pages),
+ TP_CONDITION(cpu_online(smp_processor_id())),
+
TP_STRUCT__entry(
__field( int, reason)
__field(unsigned long, pages)
--
2.1.4
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-08 0:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-08 0:58 [PATCH 0/2] [GIT PULL] tracing: Fix tlb_flush TP called in RCU ignored location Steven Rostedt
2015-02-08 0:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] tracing: Add condition check to RCU lockdep checks Steven Rostedt
2015-02-08 0:58 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150208005937.566738686@goodmis.org \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dave@sr71.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=sedat.dilek@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.