From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: Is there some way to suppress Cc email only to stable? Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 08:03:19 +0800 Message-ID: <20150210000319.GD15111@kroah.com> References: <20150209194224.GA27482@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20150209215350.GU29365@google.com> <20150209233537.GG4166@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jonathan Nieder , git@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org To: "Paul E. McKenney" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Feb 10 01:03:29 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YKyIa-0002zt-FS for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 01:03:28 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760226AbbBJAD0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Feb 2015 19:03:26 -0500 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:58333 "EHLO out1-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760022AbbBJADZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Feb 2015 19:03:25 -0500 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 533F320C98 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 19:03:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 09 Feb 2015 19:03:24 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=x-sasl-enc:date:from:to:cc:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s= smtpout; bh=b3zvwKNR0fjVE3ghAR42r6TUDhs=; b=EmLnalbvRx57yMS1lI0u P+N8utvk9CjyuA3ID+FEjlysC8lUsxeBgVuH9RFmAuKshslcL0dvAKKzQKQh713I lLTzu9YbWTDo8U3ce12T5raXfvmLD2sbjjdnHhdvv/Thmd8g120jZ+kefn1OlD9/ RLhULsIZZPfpLWB+AjV1+TE= X-Sasl-enc: 1PdITq8G0mjMI28CsrQyrBYBEUQN2j9faCfAVfJOIgnE 1423526603 Received: from localhost (unknown [210.177.145.245]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 72395C00295; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 19:03:23 -0500 (EST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150209233537.GG4166@linux.vnet.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 03:35:37PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 01:53:50PM -0800, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > > Cc: > > > > > > Yet I cannot allow git-send-email to actually send email to that address, > > > lest I get an automated nastygram in response. > > > > Interesting. Last time this came up, the result seemed to be > > different[*]. > > Hmmm... Greg KH didn't say there were no automated nastygrams, just > that he wasn't worried about it. > > I can try it on the next to-be-backported commit and see what happens. There are no "automated" nastygrams, it's a "hit this key to send out this form message" I have in my email client. The only time it triggers a false-positive is when I haven't had enough coffee in the morning, which is what happened recently with a patch from John Stultz. If I've sent you that message incorrectly, I'm sorry, please let me know. Again, any patch cc:ed to stable that has a stable mark on it in the signed-off-by area is fine, and it helps me to know to watch out for things when they hit Linus's tree, or most importantly, to notice if they somehow _don't_ hit his tree. Again, some recent patches from John fall in to that category, they didn't make it into Linus's tree when they probably should have for 3.19, and now I need to scoop them up quickly when they finally do. If I hadn't been cc:ed on them, I would not have noticed that. Hope this helps explain things, greg k-h