From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 22:24:12 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] staging: android: Remove allocation from declaration line Message-Id: <20150210222412.GA27072@kroah.com> List-Id: References: <20150210110945.GA17910@sloth> In-Reply-To: <20150210110945.GA17910@sloth> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Quentin Lambert Cc: Arve =?utf-8?B?SGrvv71ubmV277+9Zw==?= , Riley Andrews , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:09:45PM +0100, Quentin Lambert wrote: > This patch removes allocation from declaration line because > people are known to gloss over declarations. Then those people should not be reviewing kernel code :) Seriously, this is unneeded churn, the code is fine as-is. thanks, greg k-h From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754785AbbBJWYT (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Feb 2015 17:24:19 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:50882 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754138AbbBJWYS (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Feb 2015 17:24:18 -0500 Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 06:24:12 +0800 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Quentin Lambert Cc: Arve =?utf-8?B?SGrvv71ubmV277+9Zw==?= , Riley Andrews , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] staging: android: Remove allocation from declaration line Message-ID: <20150210222412.GA27072@kroah.com> References: <20150210110945.GA17910@sloth> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150210110945.GA17910@sloth> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:09:45PM +0100, Quentin Lambert wrote: > This patch removes allocation from declaration line because > people are known to gloss over declarations. Then those people should not be reviewing kernel code :) Seriously, this is unneeded churn, the code is fine as-is. thanks, greg k-h