From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: Fwd: [Bug 92111] Power regression from 3.17 to 3.18 and 3.19 Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 01:43:06 +0000 Message-ID: <20150211014306.GA15848@srcf.ucam.org> References: <1790277.SYbcblnshn@vostro.rjw.lan> <4162660.VeBlp9QsD2@vostro.rjw.lan> <20150211010150.GA14596@srcf.ucam.org> <3901843.GxiEPZOTU6@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:41931 "EHLO cavan.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751258AbbBKBnL (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Feb 2015 20:43:11 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3901843.GxiEPZOTU6@vostro.rjw.lan> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Andreas Noever , ACPI Devel Maling List , attila.jakosa@gmail.com, Len Brown On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 02:57:48AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Well, it looks like we circled back to http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=142361557824868&w=4 :-) Right. And, like I said, if there's a "We're seeing increased power consumption" bug then there's an incentive for people from Intel to actually help identify the root source, whereas if there's a "We can't enable Thunderbolt hotplug on this platform Intel pretend has nothing to do with them because otherwise we'll see increased power consumption", it's going to be so far down people's list of priorities that it's probably not going to happen. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org