From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] drm: use drmIoctl everywhere
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 15:34:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150211143447.GS24485@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACvgo52aJENR3GRNvMwCc_YQHgCxq+uV5Vm7bX8=gAzfLmEVaQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 01:13:26PM +0000, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 11 February 2015 at 11:42, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> > Well just core drm. All the other callers in there that still use
> > direct calls to ioctl have some custom retry logic already, so should
> > be good already.
> >
> Afaics intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c has one instance, plus most of the tests.
That one is in set_tiling and because of a very peculiar retry semantics
of that specific ioctl. Don't ask ;-)
>
> > freedreno/kgsl ahas all the other bare ioctl calls, dunnot what to do
> > about that.
> >
> s/ahas/has/ if you choose to keep this note.
Already reworded since kgsl is the blob library and so not a drm thing.
Thanks for your review.
-Daniel
>
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>
>
> -Emil
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-11 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-11 11:42 [PATCH 1/4] intel: Unconditionally clear ioctl structs Daniel Vetter
2015-02-11 11:42 ` [PATCH 2/4] xf86drmMode: " Daniel Vetter
2015-02-11 19:10 ` Ian Romanick
2015-02-11 11:42 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm: use drmIoctl everywhere Daniel Vetter
2015-02-11 12:21 ` Rob Clark
2015-02-11 13:13 ` Emil Velikov
2015-02-11 14:34 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2015-02-11 11:42 ` [PATCH 4/4] xf86drm: Unconditionally clear ioctl structs Daniel Vetter
2015-02-11 13:20 ` Emil Velikov
2015-02-11 15:57 ` Jan Vesely
2015-02-11 16:21 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-02-11 11:56 ` [PATCH] tests: remove intel-specific tests Daniel Vetter
2015-02-11 19:09 ` [PATCH 1/4] intel: Unconditionally clear ioctl structs Ian Romanick
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150211143447.GS24485@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=emil.l.velikov@gmail.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.