From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from devils.ext.ti.com (devils.ext.ti.com [198.47.26.153]) by arago-project.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C22305297F for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:41:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dflxv15.itg.ti.com ([128.247.5.124]) by devils.ext.ti.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id t1CFf8t4011907 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 09:41:08 -0600 Received: from DFLE72.ent.ti.com (dfle72.ent.ti.com [128.247.5.109]) by dflxv15.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t1CFf7gJ011767 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 09:41:07 -0600 Received: from dlep32.itg.ti.com (157.170.170.100) by DFLE72.ent.ti.com (128.247.5.109) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.224.2; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 09:41:06 -0600 Received: from localhost (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by dlep32.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t1CFf6bR016275; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 09:41:06 -0600 Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 10:41:06 -0500 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: "Cooper Jr., Franklin" Message-ID: <20150212154105.GC18673@edge> References: <1423148553-1225-1-git-send-email-ceh@ti.com> <20150205151353.GC9943@edge> <20150205155225.GH9943@edge> <3F32BBC6-B86C-4BF0-9F1C-F3CBD996E665@ti.com> <20150205164835.GI9943@edge> <8F29D6B095ED194EA1980491A5E029710C7F9353@DFLE08.ent.ti.com> <20150205175828.GO9943@edge> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150205175828.GO9943@edge> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: "meta-arago@arago-project.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] busybox/defconfig: Enable options required by LAVA X-BeenThere: meta-arago@arago-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Arago metadata layer for TI SDKs - OE-Core/Yocto compatible List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:41:11 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 12:58:29PM -0500, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 12:34:54PM -0500, Cooper Jr., Franklin wrote: > > > I don't believe we actively use thttpd any more. It was added way back to > > > Classic Arago to support DVSDK and running cgi scripts as root: > > > > > > http://arago- > > > project.org/git/?p=arago.git;a=commit;h=f8bf614c85f435f53a78a0151b239341 > > > 643f6a13 > > > > > > I'd vote to kill it. > > > [Franklin] I've wanted to kill it for a while but I was told that customers > > frequently asked for a very lightweight web server so we kept it there to > > show it off. Other than documentation I don't think we refer to thttpd in > > our sdk. > > So, to summarize - we'll kill separate thttpd and enable httpd in busybox. > Also, lighthttpd will stay, as it's used by matrix and is more feature-full Any comments? > > > > >>>> -CONFIG_IFUPDOWN_UDHCPC_CMD_OPTIONS="-R -n" > > > > >>>> +CONFIG_IFUPDOWN_UDHCPC_CMD_OPTIONS="-R -b" > > > > >>> > > > > > That's still not the same - with -n flag udhcp will time out soon if > > > > > not received IP address, while with -b it will go into background > > > > > and will wait for IP address there. So, if you add & at the end of > > > > > command with -n it will go into background, but exit soon after, which is not > > > the same. > > > > > > > > > So it sits indefinitely and assigns ip's whenever it can? If so I > > > > would actual prefer that. I still need to check. > > > > > > Yes, it is my understanding that it will keep on pinging the server with request- > > > IP periodically in the background, until it gets one. > > > > > > The current behaviour is it tries 3 times and if it can't get an IP, it exits with > > > error. > > > > > > In both cases, once the IP is acquired, the client has to stay in the background > > > for renewing the lease. The difference is the initial acquision. > > > [Franklin] This change will cause problems for one of our scripts. Since we > > are extremely close to our release I would prefer if we hold off on making > > this change. Wed of next week would be prefect if yall don't mind waiting. > > I'll update the scripts at that point to reflect this change. > > > > I don't see a command to manually change this behavior to mimic how it > > currently works once this change is made. So if such a command/option does > > exist then I probably can fix the scripts real quick to make that change. > > udhcpc should take those flags on the command line as well: > http://git.busybox.net/busybox/tree/networking/udhcp/dhcpc.c#n1147 Franklin, please confirm we can proceed with this change - did you get a chance to test your scripts? -- Denys