From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Lunn Subject: Re: [FOR DISCUSSION 0/8] Dove PMU support Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 17:49:52 +0100 Message-ID: <20150214164952.GF3213@lunn.ch> References: <20150214152659.GI8656@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([178.209.37.122]:44383 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753965AbbBNQww (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:52:52 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150214152659.GI8656@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: Jason Cooper , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Sebastian Hesselbarth , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Len Brown , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Mark Rutland , Pawel Moll , Rob Herring Hi Russell Thanks for posting these. Lets try to get them merged. > There are a few things which are missing from this driver, such sa the > DT binding documentation. This will follow once people are happy with > the first four patches, in particular where to locate the PMU driver > in the kernel tree. Currently, I have it in arch/arm/mach-dove, which > is where the legacy Dove code lives, so it's not ideal. Maybe time for a drivers/pmu? arch/arm/mach-dove is not good, we want to be able to use this code from arch/arm/mach-mvebu. Andrew From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: andrew@lunn.ch (Andrew Lunn) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 17:49:52 +0100 Subject: [FOR DISCUSSION 0/8] Dove PMU support In-Reply-To: <20150214152659.GI8656@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20150214152659.GI8656@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <20150214164952.GF3213@lunn.ch> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Russell Thanks for posting these. Lets try to get them merged. > There are a few things which are missing from this driver, such sa the > DT binding documentation. This will follow once people are happy with > the first four patches, in particular where to locate the PMU driver > in the kernel tree. Currently, I have it in arch/arm/mach-dove, which > is where the legacy Dove code lives, so it's not ideal. Maybe time for a drivers/pmu? arch/arm/mach-dove is not good, we want to be able to use this code from arch/arm/mach-mvebu. Andrew