From: bfields@fieldses.org (J. Bruce Fields)
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com>, NFS <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC nfs-utils] exports.man: improve documentation of 'nohide' and 'crossmnt'
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 15:17:51 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150216201751.GB22154@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150216122107.4bfd4225@notabene.brown>
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 12:21:07PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
>
>
> - note that 'nohide' is irrelevant for NFSv4
> - note that children on a 'crossmnt' filesystem cannot be unexported
> - note that 'nocrossmnt' is a valid option, but probably not useful.
>
> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
>
> ---
>
> I wonder if we should add a new option, e.g. "noaccess" so that children
> of a "crossmnt" filesystem can be hidden. The kernel wouldn't need to
> know about this. It would just tell mountd to refuse to export that
> filesystem even if the parent was "crossmnt".
> ??
Seems logical enough, but I can't recall seeing requests for it, and
the options here already seem complicated enough.
In theory something like that could also be done with namespaces. (So,
run mountd in a separate mount namespace that lacks those children.)
--b.
>
> NeilBrown
>
>
> diff --git a/utils/exportfs/exports.man b/utils/exportfs/exports.man
> index 3d974d92a729..88d9fbebe386 100644
> --- a/utils/exportfs/exports.man
> +++ b/utils/exportfs/exports.man
> @@ -218,16 +218,46 @@ This option can be very useful in some situations, but it should be
> used with due care, and only after confirming that the client system
> copes with the situation effectively.
>
> -The option can be explicitly disabled with
> +The option can be explicitly disabled for NFSv2 and NFSv3 with
> .IR hide .
> +
> +This option is not relevant when NFSv4 is use. NFSv4 never hides
> +subordinate filesystems. Any filesystem that is exported will be
> +visible where expected when using NFSv4.
> .TP
> -.IR crossmnt
> +.I crossmnt
> This option is similar to
> .I nohide
> -but it makes it possible for clients to move from the filesystem marked
> -with crossmnt to exported filesystems mounted on it. Thus when a child
> -filesystem "B" is mounted on a parent "A", setting crossmnt on "A" has
> -the same effect as setting "nohide" on B.
> +but it makes it possible for clients to access all filesystems mounted
> +on a filesystem marked with
> +.IR crossmnt .
> +Thus when a child filesystem "B" is mounted on a parent "A", setting
> +crossmnt on "A" has a similar effect to setting "nohide" on B.
> +
> +With
> +.I nohide
> +the child filesystem needs to be explicitly exported. With
> +.I crossmnt
> +it need not. If a child of a
> +.I crossmnt
> +file is not explicitly exported, then it will be implicitly exported
> +with the same export options as the parent, except for
> +.IR fsid= .
> +This makes it impossible to
> +.B not
> +export a child of a
> +.I crossmnt
> +filesystem. If some but not all subordinate filesystems of a parent
> +are to be exported, then they must be explicitly exported and the
> +parent should not have
> +.I crossmnt
> +set.
> +
> +The
> +.I nocrossmnt
> +option can explictly disable
> +.I crossmnt
> +if it was previously set. This is rarely useful.
> .TP
> .IR no_subtree_check
> This option disables subtree checking, which has mild security
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-16 20:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-16 1:21 [PATCH/RFC nfs-utils] exports.man: improve documentation of 'nohide' and 'crossmnt' NeilBrown
2015-02-16 20:17 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2015-02-16 23:06 ` Trond Myklebust
2015-02-18 1:42 ` NeilBrown
2015-02-18 1:41 ` NeilBrown
2015-02-18 1:54 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-02-18 2:09 ` NeilBrown
2015-02-18 2:54 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-02-26 19:37 ` Steve Dickson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150216201751.GB22154@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=SteveD@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.