From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>,
Ondrej Kozina <okozina@redhat.com>, Milan Broz <mbroz@redhat.com>
Subject: targeting dm-crypt cpu scalability changes for 3.20 still [was: Re: [git pull] device mapper changes for 3.16]
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 16:01:43 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150216210142.GA22223@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140612141337.GB27768@redhat.com>
On Thu, Jun 12 2014 at 10:13am -0400,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> This pull request is later than I'd have liked because I was waiting for
> some performance data to help finally justify sending the long-standing
> dm-crypt cpu scalability improvements upstream. Unfortunately we came
> up short, so those dm-crypt changes will continue to wait, but it seems
> we're not far off.
I'm sharing this because I recently saw you use dm-crypt with Fedora on
your workstation.
Just wanted to let you know that these same dm-crypt changes are staged
in for-next (like they were for months). But now with the added ability
to use feature flags to disable the new changes that proved to hurt some
workloads. If curious, feel free to see the topmost 7 commits here:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/device-mapper/linux-dm.git/log/?h=dm-for-3.20
Those who are cc'd are involved with validating these dm-crypt changes
against the new 3.20 baseline.
If all goes as expected I'll have another 3.20 merge pull request for
you by the end of the week (with context for where impressive
performance improvements have been seen).
Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-16 21:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-12 14:13 [git pull] device mapper changes for 3.16 Mike Snitzer
2015-02-16 21:01 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2015-02-20 15:48 ` [git pull] additional device mapper changes for 3.20 Mike Snitzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150216210142.GA22223@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbroz@redhat.com \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=okozina@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.