From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:56313 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751713AbbBQQbw (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Feb 2015 11:31:52 -0500 Received: from relay1.suse.de (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2556ABB1 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 16:31:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 17:31:49 +0100 From: Jan Kara Subject: Test xfs/106 failure Message-ID: <20150217163149.GA1824@quack.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: fstests-owner@vger.kernel.org To: fstests@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hello, I'm consistently getting failure in xfs/106 test because the files created by fsstress are just completely different from what they are expected to be. It almost seems as if the random numbers generated for fsstress are different. Anyone has seen this as well? Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR