From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [RFH] GSoC 2015 application Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 04:48:44 -0500 Message-ID: <20150220094844.GB30127@peff.net> References: <20150218191417.GA7767@peff.net> <54E6C78D.3070506@alum.mit.edu> <20150220072924.GC8763@peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Michael Haggerty , Stefan Beller , Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org To: Matthieu Moy X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Feb 20 10:48:55 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YOkCb-0008M8-4A for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 10:48:53 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753779AbbBTJsr (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Feb 2015 04:48:47 -0500 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([50.56.180.127]:51455 "HELO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753618AbbBTJsr (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Feb 2015 04:48:47 -0500 Received: (qmail 14961 invoked by uid 102); 20 Feb 2015 09:48:47 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.1) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 03:48:47 -0600 Received: (qmail 8682 invoked by uid 107); 20 Feb 2015 09:48:45 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 04:48:45 -0500 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 20 Feb 2015 04:48:44 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:39:42AM +0100, Matthieu Moy wrote: > Jeff King writes: > > > - Matthieu, who also cited time constraints > > Just to clarify: last year we were co-mentoring with Ram. I ended up > having a lot of time and did most of the work (not blaming Ram, and I > enjoyed the experience). I'm still motivated to co-mentor, but this time > the co-mentoring has to be more balanced (or unballanced to the other > mentor ;-) ). Yes, but who is your co-mentor this year? :) > From your list, it seems we can target 1 or 2 slots. I'd say it's still > worth applying, but if we don't find more mentors then perhaps it would > make sense to say so explicitely in > http://git.github.io/SoC-2015-Ideas.html so that students looking for > organization know that we'll have very few slots. I don't mind doing 1 slot if that's what we have resources for. But if we have to say "eh, we do not really have enough mentors to support you", then I wonder if it is worth doing. They do not know how many people have applied, or how tight the competition is. -Peff