From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38574)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rkrcmar@redhat.com>) id 1YOpjW-00047u-7F
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 10:43:15 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rkrcmar@redhat.com>) id 1YOpjS-00006J-1I
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 10:43:14 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:47442)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rkrcmar@redhat.com>) id 1YOpjR-00006E-Pd
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 10:43:09 -0500
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 16:43:06 +0100
From: Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20150220154305.GC18126@potion.brq.redhat.com>
References: <1424441905-5735-1-git-send-email-rkrcmar@redhat.com>
	<1424441905-5735-2-git-send-email-rkrcmar@redhat.com>
	<54E746CE.7020409@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <54E746CE.7020409@redhat.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] fix GCC 5.0.0 logical-not-parentheses
	warnings
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

2015-02-20 15:38+0100, Paolo Bonzini:
> On 20/02/2015 15:18, Radim Kr=C4=8Dm=C3=A1=C5=99 wrote:
> > -    if (!!n->vhost_started =3D=3D
> > +    if ((!!n->vhost_started) =3D=3D
> >          (virtio_net_started(n, status) && !nc->peer->link_down)) {
>=20
> Does it still break if you just swap the terms?

No (there is no logical not on left side then), will do that.