From: Jiri Bohac <jbohac@suse.cz>
To: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Bohac <jbohac@suse.cz>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] time, ntp: Do not update time_state in middle of leap second [v3]
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 18:19:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150220171915.GA32136@midget.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54E7417B.1090900@redhat.com>
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 09:15:23AM -0500, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> On 02/19/2015 12:00 PM, Jiri Bohac wrote:
> > Prarit, can you explain who sets the STA_PLL flag, so that
> > process_adj_status() detects a STA_PLL->!STA_PLL transition and
> > goes to the branch that sets time_state = TIME_OK?
>
> Jiri,
>
> The test being run is:
>
> https://github.com/johnstultz-work/timetests/blob/master/leap-a-day.c
>
> prior to commit
>
> https://github.com/johnstultz-work/timetests/commit/be4526e8b5d48cd108a8d2cf7f5c8fd763acf421
I can't make sense of the output of your test:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 08:58:19AM -0500, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> [ 942.952833] time_state [1] change from TIME_OK to TIME_INS
>
> Fri Feb 13 18:59:51 2015 + 318126 us TIME_INS
> Fri Feb 13 18:59:51 2015 + 818167 us TIME_INS
> Fri Feb 13 18:59:52 2015 + 318208 us TIME_INS
> Fri Feb 13 18:59:52 2015 + 818248 us TIME_INS
> Fri Feb 13 18:59:53 2015 + 318290 us TIME_INS
> Fri Feb 13 18:59:53 2015 + 818331 us TIME_INS
> Fri Feb 13 18:59:54 2015 + 318372 us TIME_INS
> Fri Feb 13 18:59:54 2015 + 818413 us TIME_INS
> Fri Feb 13 18:59:55 2015 + 318454 us TIME_INS
> Fri Feb 13 18:59:55 2015 + 818495 us TIME_INS
> Fri Feb 13 18:59:56 2015 + 318534 us TIME_INS
> Fri Feb 13 18:59:56 2015 + 818575 us TIME_INS
Why did the test program print the above lines? It's supposed to
sleep until 3 seconds prior to the midnight:
/* Wake up 3 seconds before leap */
ts.tv_sec = next_leap - 3;
ts.tv_nsec = 0;
while(clock_nanosleep(CLOCK_REALTIME, TIMER_ABSTIME, &ts, NULL))
printf("Something woke us up, returning to sleep\n");
> Fri Feb 13 18:59:57 2015 + 318617 us TIME_INS
> Fri Feb 13 18:59:57 2015 + 818660 us TIME_INS
> Fri Feb 13 18:59:58 2015 + 318702 us TIME_INS
> Fri Feb 13 18:59:58 2015 + 818744 us TIME_INS
> Fri Feb 13 18:59:59 2015 + 318785 us TIME_INS
> Fri Feb 13 18:59:59 2015 + 818837 us TIME_INS
>
> [ 952.953143] time_state [4] change from TIME_INS to TIME_OOP
> [ 952.953150] Clock: inserting leap second 23:59:60 UTC
> [ 953.299905] process_adj_status: insert_leap_sec[1223] setting time_state back
> to TIME_OK [1, 1] <<< adjtimex() call every 1/2 second
> [ 953.299913] time_state [9] change from TIME_OOP to TIME_OK
2) The only place where the test program sets STA_PLL is in
clear_time_state(); It clears it right after that.
clear_time_state() is not called inside the while "(now < next_leap+2)" loop,
except in the SIGINT/SIGKILL handler. Did you send signals to the program
at this point?
If not, I can't understand how the status went from STA_PLL to !STA_PLL
and thus why time_state went to TIME_OK
--
Jiri Bohac <jbohac@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, SUSE CZ
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-20 17:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-12 13:58 [PATCH] time, ntp: Do not update time_state in middle of leap second [v3] Prarit Bhargava
2015-02-17 23:16 ` John Stultz
2015-02-18 17:14 ` Jiri Bohac
2015-02-18 17:38 ` Jiri Bohac
2015-02-20 14:12 ` Prarit Bhargava
2015-02-19 17:00 ` Jiri Bohac
2015-02-20 14:15 ` Prarit Bhargava
2015-02-20 17:19 ` Jiri Bohac [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150220171915.GA32136@midget.suse.cz \
--to=jbohac@suse.cz \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mlichvar@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.