From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Al Viro Subject: Re: [RFC] split struct kiocb Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 21:39:47 +0000 Message-ID: <20150223213947.GI29656@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <1424714436-19371-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <20150223212059.GH29656@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20150223212224.GA29212@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Maxim Patlasov , Robert Baldyga , Michal Nazarewicz , Felipe Balbi , linux-aio@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Return-path: Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:41551 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752197AbbBWVjz (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Feb 2015 16:39:55 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150223212224.GA29212@lst.de> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 10:22:24PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 09:20:59PM +0000, Al Viro wrote: > > PS: I would prefer to rebase #iov_iter and #gadget to -rc1, actually... > > Btw, any chance to sneak dup_iter to Linus for this release? I ended > up adding an opencoded version to the block layer for this merge window, > and I'd prefer to get these consolidated ASAP. Hmm... Let's wait for USB folks to review those fixes - dup_iter() is helper needed for a fix of easily triggered use-after-free bug, after all, and beginning of the cycle is obviously OK for such.