From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <mleitner@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net] ipv6: addrconf: validate new MTU before applying it
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 00:10:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150223231002.GA32636@kria> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <463ebd12cf29ddcf17275bdde9fb629444a5fa5b.1424698335.git.mleitner@redhat.com>
2015-02-23, 11:17:13 -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> Currently we don't check if the new MTU is valid or not and this allows
> one to configure a smaller than minimum allowed by RFCs or even bigger
> than interface own MTU, which is a problem as it may lead to packet
> drops.
>
> If you have a daemon like NetworkManager running, this may be exploited
> by remote attackers by forging RA packets with an invalid MTU, possibly
> leading to a DoS. (NetworkManager currently only validates for values
> too small, but not for too big ones.)
>
> The fix is just to make sure the new value is valid. That is, between
> IPV6_MIN_MTU and interface's MTU.
>
> Note that similar check is already performed at
> ndisc_router_discovery(), for when kernel itself parses the RA.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <mleitner@redhat.com>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> Sabrina, please feel free to add your Signed-off-by if you want.
>
> v1->v2, applied Sabrina's notes:
> use proc_dointvec_minmax instead
> protect against all and default cases, which don't have idev
>
> all and default are simply not used, so we are good to simply ignore the
> max values for them. The default value actually comes from interface MTU
> during creation.
>
> net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Signed-off-by: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
Thanks Marcelo.
--
Sabrina
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-23 23:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-23 14:17 [PATCH v2 net] ipv6: addrconf: validate new MTU before applying it Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2015-02-23 23:10 ` Sabrina Dubroca [this message]
2015-02-23 23:16 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150223231002.GA32636@kria \
--to=sd@queasysnail.net \
--cc=mleitner@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.