From: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
To: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix frontbuffer false positve.
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 13:42:39 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150224214239.GS594@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1424813874-2395-1-git-send-email-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 01:37:54PM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> This return 0 without setting atomic bits on fb == crtc->cursor->fb
> where causing frontbuffer false positives.
>
> According to Daniel:
>
> The original regression seems to have been introduced in the original
> check/commit split:
>
> commit 757f9a3e5b8a812af0c213099a5b31cb423f4d3c
> Author: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
> Date: Wed Sep 24 14:20:24 2014 -0300
>
> drm/i915: move check of intel_crtc_cursor_set_obj() out
>
> Which already cause other trouble, resulting in the check getting moved in
>
> commit e391ea882b1a04fb3f559287ac694652a3cd9da9
> Author: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
> Date: Wed Sep 24 14:20:25 2014 -0300
>
> drm/i915: Fix not checking cursor and object sizes
>
> The frontbuffer tracking itself only was broken when we shifted it into
> the check/commit logic with:
>
> commit 32b7eeec4d1e861230b09d437e95d76c86ff4a68
> Author: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> Date: Wed Dec 24 07:59:06 2014 -0800
>
> drm/i915: Refactor work that can sleep out of commit (v7)
>
> v2: When putting more debug prints I notice the solution was simpler
> than I thought. AMS design is solid, just this return was wrong.
> Sorry for the noise.
>
> v3: Remove the entire chunck that would probably
> be removed by gcc anyway. (by Daniel)
>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
> Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Not sure I understand Daniel's remark about gcc optimization, but the
change still looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 8ccf033..900dcaa 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -12197,9 +12197,6 @@ intel_check_cursor_plane(struct drm_plane *plane,
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> - if (fb == crtc->cursor->fb)
> - return 0;
> -
> if (fb->modifier[0] != DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NONE) {
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("cursor cannot be tiled\n");
> ret = -EINVAL;
> --
> 2.1.0
>
--
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
IoTG Platform Enabling & Development
Intel Corporation
(916) 356-2795
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-24 21:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-02 23:38 [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix frontbuffer false positve Rodrigo Vivi
2015-02-03 7:06 ` shuang.he
2015-02-03 11:57 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-02-03 16:21 ` Matt Roper
2015-02-03 18:46 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2015-02-03 19:14 ` Matt Roper
2015-02-03 19:38 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-02-03 19:40 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-02-13 1:17 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2015-02-13 8:48 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-02-24 1:52 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2015-02-24 2:13 ` Matt Roper
2015-02-24 17:32 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2015-02-24 18:00 ` Matt Roper
2015-02-24 18:36 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2015-02-24 18:44 ` Matt Roper
2015-02-24 20:38 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-02-24 21:01 ` Matt Roper
2015-02-24 21:37 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2015-02-24 21:42 ` Matt Roper [this message]
2015-02-24 22:09 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-02-25 8:13 ` Jani Nikula
2015-02-26 9:15 ` shuang.he
2015-02-26 5:11 ` shuang.he
2015-02-24 2:14 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Clear crtc atomic flags at beginning of transaction Matt Roper
2015-02-24 17:43 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2015-02-24 17:52 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2015-02-03 19:34 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix frontbuffer false positve Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150224214239.GS594@intel.com \
--to=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.