From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vinod Koul Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/28 v3] dmaengine: export symbol of of_dma_request_slave_channel() Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 12:32:40 +0530 Message-ID: <20150226070240.GU5208@intel.com> References: <87fva0opax.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <87egpkop98.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <87bnkk162d.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <20150224162619.GH5208@intel.com> <87siduambe.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87siduambe.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Sender: linux-sh-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Kuninori Morimoto Cc: Mark Brown , Geert Uytterhoeven , Simon , Linux-SH , Linux-ALSA , Liam Girdwood , Laurent , Arnd Bergmann , dmaengine@vger.kernel.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:03:03AM +0000, Kuninori Morimoto wrote: > > Hi Mark > > > > Current DMAEngine implementation of DT bindings can't support > > > DT subnode. This patch export symbols of of_dma_request_slave_channel() > > > for subnode DMA DT bingings. > > > > > > ex) > > > > > > rcar_sound: rcar_sound@ec500000 { > > > ... > > > rcar_sound,dvc { > > > dvc0: dvc@0 { > > > dmas = <&audma0 0xbc>; > > > dma-names = "tx"; > > > }; > > > dvc1: dvc@1 { > > > dmas = <&audma0 0xbe>; > > > dma-names = "tx"; > > > }; > > > }; > > > ... > > > }; > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto > > > --- > (snip) > > Typically you should post whole series. Anyway, i am okay with this patch, > > how do you want to merge this, should i pick it up or everything goes thru > > ASoC tree or something else? > > I don't know detail of maintenance side. > Which is best ? I think Mark can take the whole series with my ack on this one so Acked-by: Vinod Koul I need I will pull Marks topic into mine but I think that may not be required.. -- ~Vinod From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vinod Koul Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 07:14:40 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/28 v3] dmaengine: export symbol of of_dma_request_slave_channel() Message-Id: <20150226070240.GU5208@intel.com> List-Id: References: <87fva0opax.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <87egpkop98.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <87bnkk162d.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <20150224162619.GH5208@intel.com> <87siduambe.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> In-Reply-To: <87siduambe.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Kuninori Morimoto Cc: Mark Brown , Geert Uytterhoeven , Simon , Linux-SH , Linux-ALSA , Liam Girdwood , Laurent , Arnd Bergmann , dmaengine@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:03:03AM +0000, Kuninori Morimoto wrote: > > Hi Mark > > > > Current DMAEngine implementation of DT bindings can't support > > > DT subnode. This patch export symbols of of_dma_request_slave_channel() > > > for subnode DMA DT bingings. > > > > > > ex) > > > > > > rcar_sound: rcar_sound@ec500000 { > > > ... > > > rcar_sound,dvc { > > > dvc0: dvc@0 { > > > dmas = <&audma0 0xbc>; > > > dma-names = "tx"; > > > }; > > > dvc1: dvc@1 { > > > dmas = <&audma0 0xbe>; > > > dma-names = "tx"; > > > }; > > > }; > > > ... > > > }; > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto > > > --- > (snip) > > Typically you should post whole series. Anyway, i am okay with this patch, > > how do you want to merge this, should i pick it up or everything goes thru > > ASoC tree or something else? > > I don't know detail of maintenance side. > Which is best ? I think Mark can take the whole series with my ack on this one so Acked-by: Vinod Koul I need I will pull Marks topic into mine but I think that may not be required.. -- ~Vinod