From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 18:26:44 +0100 From: Gilles Chanteperdrix Message-ID: <20150226172644.GA434@hermes.click-hack.org> References: <447fvc5q6z.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <20150220225712.GE2356@hermes.click-hack.org> <448ufmewxt.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <20150224233439.GL14148@hermes.click-hack.org> <44siduq7us.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <54EE07A9.4040702@xenomai.org> <444mq9lo5c.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <44vbipk8m9.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <54EF014A.9000902@xenomai.org> <447fv4sk55.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <447fv4sk55.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> Subject: Re: [Xenomai] interrupt service List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Lowell Gilbert Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 11:38:30AM -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > I had used a counting semaphore (to account for possibly missed > interrupts) in an earlier version of this code before changing it to an > event when I found that the semaphore didn't work. I also tried a direct > call to rtdm_task_unblock(), and that failed also. FWIW rtdm signals work like semaphores. -- Gilles.