From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 22:21:30 +0100 From: Gilles Chanteperdrix Message-ID: <20150227212130.GP434@hermes.click-hack.org> References: <54F0CF9E.1040707@siemens.com> <20150227202724.GL434@hermes.click-hack.org> <54F0D599.8090009@siemens.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54F0D599.8090009@siemens.com> Subject: Re: [Xenomai] [RFC] Consolidated exception prologue/epiloge for x86 and ARM List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: Xenomai On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 09:37:45PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2015-02-27 21:27, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 09:12:14PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> just pushed a first implementation of the general model that I proposed > >> for exception handling. You can find it at > >> > >> http://git.xenomai.org/ipipe-jki.git/log/?h=queues/trap-rework > > > > Also, the clean way to pass virtual + physical flags is to use > > arch_mangle_bits. Using two longs (potentially 128 bits then) is > > completely useless since one of the longs simply has one significant > > bit. > > The costs of mangling is higher than using two regs for passing that > data as-is, both binary and LOC-wise (tried it). Plus the code is more > readable. That is false on ARM. On ARM gcc does not pass structs by values in registers. The values get passed on stack. -- Gilles.