From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olaf Hering Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] docs: add pvscsi.txt Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 16:14:16 +0100 Message-ID: <20150302151416.GB20719@aepfle.de> References: <1425291362-30228-1-git-send-email-olaf@aepfle.de> <1425291362-30228-4-git-send-email-olaf@aepfle.de> <54F443A3.9070806@suse.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54F443A3.9070806@suse.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Juergen Gross Cc: Keir Fraser , Ian Campbell , Tim Deegan , Ian Jackson , xen-devel@lists.xen.org, Jan Beulich List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Mon, Mar 02, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 03/02/2015 11:16 AM, Olaf Hering wrote: > >+How to do live migration? > >+ - pdev will likely be evaluated again on the target host if it came from > >+ domU.cfg. But what about pdev from 'xl scsi-attach pdev vdev'? Its required > >+ to adjust h:c:t:l on the target host. > Use WWN notation? :-) > > This was one of the reason the backend should support it. How does it handle WWN internally, given that scsiback_add_translation_entry does not seem to understand it? > >+Implement checks for duplicate pdev assignments? > >+ - Not sure if SCSI devices can be shared. Will the state be consistent during > >+ concurrent access? Should the host admin assume cooperative access from > >+ multiple domUs? > SCSI does support device sharing. That's the reason for the existence of > SCSI commands like "reserve" and "release". In this case the code which checks pdev usage in libxl_device_vscsi_get_host can just be removed. Olaf