From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Thornber Subject: Re: dm-cache failure semantics in write-back mode Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 17:28:12 +0000 Message-ID: <20150303172811.GB23166@debian> References: <20150303161935.GA23166@debian> Reply-To: device-mapper development Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com To: device-mapper development Cc: Thanos Makatos , heinzm@redhat.com, snitzer@redhat.com List-Id: dm-devel.ids On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 05:13:37PM +0000, Thanos Makatos wrote: > Thanks, Joe. So just to make sure I've understood correctly, if the SSD > cache is configured as a write-back cache but the device cache is > disabled/set to write-though on the HDD and the SSD, then there is no risk > of data loss in the event of a failure. Is my understanding correct? IO that has completed will have really hit the disk.