All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Michel Machado <michel@digirati.com.br>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux XIA - merge proposal
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 21:49:24 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150304054924.GA27610@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54F6527E.6080406@digirati.com.br>

On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 07:31:58PM -0500, Michel Machado wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> >>We're fine with clearly marking Linux XIA as being under staging
> >>as well as helping to define this review process for network stacks.
> >
> >With regard to staging, the code there is usually horrible and I'm
> >not sure anyone really looks there, that would mitigate the review
> >problem to the time when you try to get it out from there, so I'm
> >not sure it brings anything. ;)
> 
>    I suggested staging as a way to incrementally review the code.

Yet you failed to at least ask the maintainer of the staging portion of
the kernel, if this is a valid use of staging, and his resources...

Not nice :(

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-04  6:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-03 17:29 Linux XIA - merge proposal Michel Machado
2015-03-03 23:33 ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-03-04  0:14   ` Michel Machado
2015-03-04  0:01 ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-03-04  0:31   ` Michel Machado
2015-03-04  5:49     ` Greg KH [this message]
2015-03-04 13:01       ` Michel Machado
2015-03-05 16:31 ` Alex Elsayed
2015-03-05 18:34 ` Michel Machado
2015-03-10 17:01 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-03-10 17:19   ` Eric Dumazet
2015-03-10 22:01     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-03-13 15:26   ` Michel Machado
2015-03-15  9:37     ` Greg KH
2015-03-15 10:03       ` Oded Gabbay
2015-03-17 12:37         ` Michel Machado
2015-03-17 12:25       ` Michel Machado
2015-03-18 10:27         ` Oded Gabbay
2015-03-20 18:46           ` Michel Machado
2015-03-20 19:41             ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150304054924.GA27610@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michel@digirati.com.br \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.