From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759695AbbCDSO1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Mar 2015 13:14:27 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:56963 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759656AbbCDSOZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Mar 2015 13:14:25 -0500 Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 10:14:24 -0800 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Stefan Bader Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Jiang Liu , Sander Eikelenboom , Tony Luck , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , David Vrabel , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , Pavel Machek , Bjorn Helgaas , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.18 129/151] x86/xen: Treat SCI interrupt as normal GSI interrupt Message-ID: <20150304181424.GC13218@kroah.com> References: <20150304055457.084276421@linuxfoundation.org> <20150304055518.612312946@linuxfoundation.org> <54F6FFE9.7030409@canonical.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54F6FFE9.7030409@canonical.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 01:51:53PM +0100, Stefan Bader wrote: > On 04.03.2015 07:14, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > 3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > I thought I replied earlier today but I cannot seem to find it coming back via > the mailing list. Hope this is not duplicating too much... There was a > regression with that patch and it requires the below commit as well to prevent that: > > commit 1ea76fbadd667b19c4fa4466f3a3b55a505e83d9 > Author: Jiang Liu > Date: Mon Feb 16 10:11:13 2015 +0800 > > x86/irq: Fix regression caused by commit b568b8601f05 > > Commit b568b8601f05 ("Treat SCI interrupt as normal GSI interrupt") > accidently removes support of legacy PIC interrupt when fixing a > regression for Xen, which causes a nasty regression on HP/Compaq > nc6000 where we fail to register the ACPI interrupt, and thus > lose eg. thermal notifications leading a potentially overheated > machine. Thanks for this, now applied. greg k-h