From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: [TOPIC] scsi-queue tree past and future Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 14:31:18 +0100 Message-ID: <20150305133118.GA16575@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:52250 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932320AbbCENbU (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Mar 2015 08:31:20 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: lsf@lists.linux-foundation.org, lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org For about 8 month I've merged almost every scsi commit through the scsi-queue staging tree, and it seems to have worked out well enough. I've been too busy for the next cycle, so 4.1 will probably have to live without it. I'd like to get feedback on how the tree worked for contributors and driver maintainers, and brainstorm how to move forward with it, preferably some form of real team maintainance that avoids single points of failure.