From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lukasz Majewski Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 2/2] Samsung fixes-2 for v4.0 Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 08:44:18 +0100 Message-ID: <20150309084418.227b3e16@amdc2363> References: <54F4B33E.3070803@kernel.org> <2064108.qlOP0oDx90@wuerfel> <02cd01d057f6$ab1a8e40$014faac0$@kernel.org> <20150305123358.GC25728@developer.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailout3.samsung.com ([203.254.224.33]:43693 "EHLO mailout3.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752550AbbCIHok (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Mar 2015 03:44:40 -0400 Received: from epcpsbgm2.samsung.com (epcpsbgm2 [203.254.230.27]) by mailout3.samsung.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-24.01(7.0.4.24.0) 64bit (built Nov 17 2011)) with ESMTP id <0NKX00GKGPI0LO60@mailout3.samsung.com> for linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 16:44:24 +0900 (KST) In-reply-to: <20150305123358.GC25728@developer.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Eduardo Valentin Cc: Kukjin Kim , 'Kevin Hilman' , arm@kernel.org, 'Arnd Bergmann' , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, 'Olof Johansson' , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, 'Marek Szyprowski' Hi Eduardo, > On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 07:16:53PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > > + Eduardo > > > > Hi Arnd, > > > > > On Tuesday 03 March 2015 04:00:14 Kukjin Kim wrote: > > > > Please pull Samsung tmu and hdmi regression fixes for v4.0 and > > > > I know this is quite big for fixes but I couldn't handle this > > > > series for previous merge window because of dependency with > > > > driver side...sorry for that and please pull so that we could > > > > support them in v4.0 on exynos platforms. > > > > > > What kind of dependency do you have there? It really should not be > > > necessary to wait for driver changes, unless you do an > > > incompatible DT binding change, which you should avoid. > > > > > For TMU patches, I've asked Eduardo to provide topic branch for > > 'include/dt-bindings/thermal/thermal_exynos.h' has been added via > > thermal tree because if I can't apply the patch in Samsung tree for > > arm-soc, kernel build breakage will be happened. But I couldn't get > > Eduardo's topic branch. > > > Specifically, the developer, while migrating the driver to support DT > and OF thermal, decided to create a header with constants. The header > is used by DT files and the driver code. The header was the > dependency. Just my 2 cents :-). The above situation is the justification for adding the whole patch set to one repository when all ACKs are collected for it. > > > BR, > > Eduardo Valentin > > > > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg41877.html > > > > > > For HDMI patches, I thought the DT changes have a dependency with > > "drm/exynos: add support for 'hdmi' clock" so waited for its > > applying then in drm tree. But I couldn't send it to arm-soc after > > that... > > > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg42173.html > > > > > > I asked about the situation (late DT changes?) when I sent a > > pull-request, then I couldn't get a access my kernel.org because of > > biz. trip to China :( > > > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg42235.html > > > > > > > I've pulled it into fixes, but won't forward it until I hear a > > > good explanation. > > > > > As you know, basically I tried to make a clear branch for > > pull-request but in that case, I couldn't find a solution. Sorry > > for the inconvenience. > > > > I hope v4.0 can support them properly. > > > > Thanks, > > Kukjin > > -- Best regards, Lukasz Majewski Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: l.majewski@samsung.com (Lukasz Majewski) Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 08:44:18 +0100 Subject: [GIT PULL 2/2] Samsung fixes-2 for v4.0 In-Reply-To: <20150305123358.GC25728@developer.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> References: <54F4B33E.3070803@kernel.org> <2064108.qlOP0oDx90@wuerfel> <02cd01d057f6$ab1a8e40$014faac0$@kernel.org> <20150305123358.GC25728@developer.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> Message-ID: <20150309084418.227b3e16@amdc2363> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Eduardo, > On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 07:16:53PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > > + Eduardo > > > > Hi Arnd, > > > > > On Tuesday 03 March 2015 04:00:14 Kukjin Kim wrote: > > > > Please pull Samsung tmu and hdmi regression fixes for v4.0 and > > > > I know this is quite big for fixes but I couldn't handle this > > > > series for previous merge window because of dependency with > > > > driver side...sorry for that and please pull so that we could > > > > support them in v4.0 on exynos platforms. > > > > > > What kind of dependency do you have there? It really should not be > > > necessary to wait for driver changes, unless you do an > > > incompatible DT binding change, which you should avoid. > > > > > For TMU patches, I've asked Eduardo to provide topic branch for > > 'include/dt-bindings/thermal/thermal_exynos.h' has been added via > > thermal tree because if I can't apply the patch in Samsung tree for > > arm-soc, kernel build breakage will be happened. But I couldn't get > > Eduardo's topic branch. > > > Specifically, the developer, while migrating the driver to support DT > and OF thermal, decided to create a header with constants. The header > is used by DT files and the driver code. The header was the > dependency. Just my 2 cents :-). The above situation is the justification for adding the whole patch set to one repository when all ACKs are collected for it. > > > BR, > > Eduardo Valentin > > > > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg41877.html > > > > > > For HDMI patches, I thought the DT changes have a dependency with > > "drm/exynos: add support for 'hdmi' clock" so waited for its > > applying then in drm tree. But I couldn't send it to arm-soc after > > that... > > > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg42173.html > > > > > > I asked about the situation (late DT changes?) when I sent a > > pull-request, then I couldn't get a access my kernel.org because of > > biz. trip to China :( > > > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg42235.html > > > > > > > I've pulled it into fixes, but won't forward it until I hear a > > > good explanation. > > > > > As you know, basically I tried to make a clear branch for > > pull-request but in that case, I couldn't find a solution. Sorry > > for the inconvenience. > > > > I hope v4.0 can support them properly. > > > > Thanks, > > Kukjin > > -- Best regards, Lukasz Majewski Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group