From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>,
Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: save user %rsp in pt_regs->sp on SYSCALL64 fastpath
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2015 17:18:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150309161859.GA22871@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1425847750-23362-3-git-send-email-dvlasenk@redhat.com>
* Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> wrote:
> PER_CPU(old_rsp) usage is simplified - now it is used only
> as temp storage, and userspace stack pointer is immediately stored
> in pt_regs->sp on syscall entry, instead of being used later,
> on syscall exit.
>
> All references of PER_CPU(old_rsp) in C code are gone -
> pt_regs->sp is used instead.
>
> This also allows to get rid of thread_struct::usersp,
> which was needed only to set PER_CPU(old_rsp) for
> correct return from fork/clone.
Would it be possible to split this one into two parts as well:
- Essential changes into the first one (old_rsp update
simplification, usersp usage conversion)
- Removal of usersp, old_rsp extern declaration removal, comment
changes, in the second patch?
Thanks,
Ingo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-09 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-08 20:49 [PATCH 0/2] x86: entry_64.S: steps towards simpler iret frame handling Denys Vlasenko
2015-03-08 20:49 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86: save r11 into pt_regs->flags on SYSCALL64 fastpath Denys Vlasenko
2015-03-09 16:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-08 20:49 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86: save user %rsp in pt_regs->sp " Denys Vlasenko
2015-03-09 16:18 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150309161859.GA22871@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@plumgrid.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=wad@chromium.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.