Re: meta-networking pending patches

[Joe MacDonald <Joe_MacDonald@mentor.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2546 bytes --]

[Re: [oe] meta-networking pending patches] On 15.03.11 (Wed 13:39) Martin Jansa wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 06:27:18PM -0400, Joe MacDonald wrote:
> > [Re: [oe] meta-networking pending patches] On 15.03.10 (Tue 13:44) MacDonald, Joe wrote:
> > 
> > > Sure thing. I'll have a look today and update the status appropriately.
> > > 
> > > -J.
> > > 
> > > On 10 Mar 2015 06:30, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hi Joe,
> > > 
> > > can you please check pending meta-networking patches?
> > > 
> > > my master-next shows:
> > > pick e7be331 openl2tp: add new recipe
> > 
> > This has already been merged (ab75a8c8d0a57411af1452f9f8f41ccf29bb0cc7)
> > and I don't see it in my patchworks list now.  The filter I'm using is
> > this:
> > 
> > http://patchwork.openembedded.org/project/oe/list/?state=1&q=meta-networking&archive=both
> 
> OK, master-next version was adding it to recipes-daemons instead of
> recipes-protocols, that's why it wasn't resolved when rebasing
> master-next. Will drop it now from master-next.
> 
> Please use meta-networking bundle as filter as well:
> http://patchwork.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/meta-networking/?archive=both
> http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Patchwork#Multiple_layers_sharing_the_same_oe_project_on_patchwork

Sure.  I'm working on reviewing the other outstanding ones now.

> > > and few more are in patchwork:
> > > http://patchwork.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/meta-networking/?archive=both
> > 
> > The others in this list also look like they were missed because they
> > didn't contain the meta-networking tag in the subject line.  Are you
> > manually creating that bundle or do you just have better filtering
> > technology than I do for catching these oddball ones?
> 
> I'm maintaining all bundles manually
> 
> First I add to bundles based on e-mail prefix, but then when I'm reading
> the commits for cherry-picking them to master-next I sometimes notice
> that the patch is touching some layer without saying so in subject
> prefix and I add these oddball onces to separate bundle just before
> cherry-pick.

Okay, good to know.  I've completely switched to using pwclient for my
workflow, but I'll try to keep on top of the outliers as well.  Unless
there's a pwclient-friendly way to work with bundles.  I haven't found
anything while poking around except some out-of-tree patches from ~6y
ago.  If you notice something lingering in the bundle, please go ahead
and ping me on it.

-- 
-Joe MacDonald.
:wq

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 501 bytes --]