All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Simon Farnsworth <simon.farnsworth@onelan.co.uk>
Cc: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/dp: Use large transactions for I2C over AUX
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 21:28:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150311192820.GZ11371@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150211120521.GS9152@intel.com>

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 02:05:21PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 06:38:08PM +0000, Simon Farnsworth wrote:
> > Older DisplayPort to DVI-D Dual Link adapters designed by Bizlink have bugs
> > in their I2C over AUX implementation (fixed in newer revisions). They work
> > fine with Windows, but fail with Linux.
> > 
> > It turns out that they cannot keep an I2C transaction open unless the
> > previous read was 16 bytes; shorter reads can only be followed by a zero
> > byte transfer ending the I2C transaction.
> > 
> > Copy Windows's behaviour, and read 16 bytes at a time. If we get a short
> > reply, assume that there's a hardware bottleneck, and shrink our read size
> > to match. For this purpose, use the algorithm in the DisplayPort 1.2 spec,
> > in the hopes that it'll be closest to what Windows does.
> > 
> > Also provide an unsafe module parameter for testing smaller transfer sizes,
> > in case there are sinks out there that cannot work with Windows.
> > 
> > Note also that despite the previous comment in drm_dp_i2c_xfer, this speeds
> > up native DP EDID reads; Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> found
> > the following changes in his testing:
> > 
> > Device under test:     old  -> with this patch
> > DP->DVI (OUI 001cf8):  40ms -> 35ms
> > DP->VGA (OUI 0022b9):  45ms -> 38ms
> > Zotac DP->2xHDMI:      25ms ->  4ms
> > Asus PB278 monitor:    22ms ->  3ms
> > 
> > A back of the envelope calculation shows that peak theoretical transfer rate
> > for 1 byte reads is around 60 kbit/s; with 16 byte reads, this increases to
> > around 500 kbit/s, which explains the increase in speed.
> > 
> > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55228
> > Tested-by: Aidan Marks <aidanamarks@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Simon Farnsworth <simon.farnsworth@onelan.co.uk>
> > ---
> > 
> > v4 changes:
> > 
> >  * Change short reply algorithm after suggestions from Ville.
> > 
> >  * Expanded commit message.
> > 
> >  * Mark the module parameter unsafe.
> > 
> >  * Use clamp() to bring the module parameter into range when used.
> > 
> > v3 changes, after feedback from Ville and more testing of Windows:
> > 
> >  * Change the short reply algorithm to match Ville's description of the
> >    DisplayPort 1.2 spec wording.
> > 
> >  * Add a module parameter to set the default transfer size for
> >    experiments. Requested over IRC by Ville.
> > 
> > No-one's been able to find a device that does short replies, but experiments
> > show that bigger reads are faster on most devices. Ville got:
> > 
> >  DP->DVI (OUI 001cf8):  40ms -> 35ms
> >  DP->VGA (OUI 0022b9):  45ms -> 38ms
> >  Zotac DP->2xHDMI:      25ms ->  4ms
> > 
> > v2 changes, after feedback from Thierry and Ville:
> > 
> >  * Handle short replies. I've decided (arbitrarily) that a short reply
> >    results in us dropping back to the newly chosen size for the rest of this
> >    I2C transaction. Thus, given an attempt to read the first 16 bytes of
> >    EDID, and a sink that only does 4 bytes of buffering, we will see the
> >    following AUX transfers for the EDID read (after address is set):
> > 
> >    <set address, block etc>
> >    Read 16 bytes from I2C over AUX.
> >    Reply with 4 bytes
> >    Read 4 bytes
> >    Reply with 4 bytes
> >    Read 4 bytes
> >    Reply with 4 bytes
> >    Read 4 bytes
> >    Reply with 4 bytes
> >    <end I2C transaction>
> > 
> > Note that I've not looked at MST support - I have neither the DP 1.2 spec
> > nor any MST branch devices, so I can't test anything I write or check it
> > against a spec. It looks from the code, however, as if MST has the branch
> > device do the split from a big request into small transactions.
> > 
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> >  include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h     |  5 +++
> >  2 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> > index 79968e3..105fd66 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> > @@ -396,11 +396,13 @@ static u32 drm_dp_i2c_functionality(struct i2c_adapter *adapter)
> >   * retrying the transaction as appropriate.  It is assumed that the
> >   * aux->transfer function does not modify anything in the msg other than the
> >   * reply field.
> > + *
> > + * Returns bytes transferred on success, or a negative error code on failure.
> >   */
> >  static int drm_dp_i2c_do_msg(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg)
> >  {
> >  	unsigned int retry;
> > -	int err;
> > +	int ret;
> >  
> >  	/*
> >  	 * DP1.2 sections 2.7.7.1.5.6.1 and 2.7.7.1.6.6.1: A DP Source device
> > @@ -409,14 +411,14 @@ static int drm_dp_i2c_do_msg(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg)
> >  	 */
> >  	for (retry = 0; retry < 7; retry++) {
> >  		mutex_lock(&aux->hw_mutex);
> > -		err = aux->transfer(aux, msg);
> > +		ret = aux->transfer(aux, msg);
> >  		mutex_unlock(&aux->hw_mutex);
> > -		if (err < 0) {
> > -			if (err == -EBUSY)
> > +		if (ret < 0) {
> > +			if (ret == -EBUSY)
> >  				continue;
> >  
> > -			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("transaction failed: %d\n", err);
> > -			return err;
> > +			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("transaction failed: %d\n", ret);
> > +			return ret;
> >  		}
> >  
> >  
> > @@ -457,9 +459,7 @@ static int drm_dp_i2c_do_msg(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg)
> >  			 * Both native ACK and I2C ACK replies received. We
> >  			 * can assume the transfer was successful.
> >  			 */
> > -			if (err < msg->size)
> > -				return -EPROTO;
> > -			return 0;
> > +			return ret;
> >  
> >  		case DP_AUX_I2C_REPLY_NACK:
> >  			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("I2C nack\n");
> > @@ -482,14 +482,55 @@ static int drm_dp_i2c_do_msg(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg)
> >  	return -EREMOTEIO;
> >  }
> >  
> > +/*
> > + * Keep retrying drm_dp_i2c_do_msg until all data has been transferred.
> > + *
> > + * Returns an error code on failure, or a recommended transfer size on success.
> > + */
> > +static int drm_dp_i2c_drain_msg(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, struct drm_dp_aux_msg *orig_msg)
> 
> orig_msg should be const to make sure someone doesn't change it by
> accident since that would break drm_dp_i2c_xfer().
> 
> Otherwise looks good to me, so
> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> 
> I also tested this version with a few dongles and everything seems to
> work as intended.

Did this fall through the cracks, or are we waiting for some resolution
to that one bug?


-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-11 19:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-10 18:38 [PATCH] drm/dp: Use large transactions for I2C over AUX Simon Farnsworth
2015-02-10 18:42 ` Simon Farnsworth
2015-02-11  5:36   ` Dave Airlie
2015-02-11  7:25     ` Daniel Vetter
2015-02-11  8:13 ` Jani Nikula
2015-02-11 12:05 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-03-11 19:28   ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2015-03-11 21:06     ` Daniel Vetter
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-01-26 15:22 Simon Farnsworth
2015-01-26 15:33 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-01-26 15:47   ` Simon Farnsworth
2015-01-26 16:11     ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-01-26 16:39       ` Simon Farnsworth
2015-01-27 13:36         ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-01-28  8:59           ` Jani Nikula
2015-01-28  9:10             ` Daniel Vetter
2015-01-28  9:33               ` Jani Nikula
2015-01-28 10:30                 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-01-28 10:45                 ` Simon Farnsworth
2015-01-26 16:00   ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-01-23 18:40 Simon Farnsworth
2015-01-23 19:46 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-01-23 21:21   ` Thierry Reding
2015-01-24 11:27     ` Daniel Vetter
2015-01-26  9:50     ` Simon Farnsworth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150311192820.GZ11371@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=simon.farnsworth@onelan.co.uk \
    --cc=treding@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.