From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752863AbbCLJTP (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 12 Mar 2015 05:19:15 -0400
Received: from mail-wg0-f51.google.com ([74.125.82.51]:34228 "EHLO
	mail-wg0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1750898AbbCLJTM (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 12 Mar 2015 05:19:12 -0400
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 10:19:05 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
        Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] Increased clocksource validation and cleanups (v4)
Message-ID: <20150312091905.GA15300@gmail.com>
References: <1426133800-29329-1-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1426133800-29329-1-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


* John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> wrote:

> So here is another round of this series, which is the result of
> earlier discussions with Linus and his suggestions around
> improvements to clocksource validation in the hope we can more
> easily catch bad hardware.
> 
> There's also a few cleanups Linus suggested as well as a few I've been
> meaning to get to for awhile.
> 
> I tried in address all the feedback that had been given, adding
> the checks behind CONFIG_DEBUG_TIMEKEEPING.  I also sorted out a
> sane way to print rate-limited warnings if we see cycle deltas that
> are too large, or if they look like small underflows.
> 
> I'd like to get this queued into -tip soon so it can get as much
> testing in -next as possible.
> 
> If there are any objections or feedback, I'd love to hear it!
> 
> New in v4:
> * Lots and lots of typo corrections and minor cleanups suggested
>   by Ingo.
> * Dropped "Remove clocksource_max_deferment()" patch
> * Added "Rename __clocksource_updatefreq_*..." patch
> * I realized one of the patches (Improve clocksource watchdog
>   reporting) didn't have a proper cc list, so while it was on lkml
>   folks may not have reviewed it before.

So I've applied them with some changes to tip:timers/core, please look 
at the commit notifications for details. Any outstanding review 
feedback can be addressed as delta patches on top of this I think, 
none of my observations were show-stoppers.

Thanks,

	Ingo