All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	acme@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] perf report: ordered events and flushing bug
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 10:11:16 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150316011116.GN943@sejong> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150312205053.GC2301@redhat.com>

Hi Arnaldo,

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 05:50:53PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 04:06:46PM -0400, Stephane Eranian escreveu:
> > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 3:53 PM, David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 3/12/15 1:39 PM, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> > >>
> > >> What the point of having all the ordered event logic if you are saying
> > >> events
> > >> must be saved in order. I don't think there is a way to make that
> > >> guarantee
> > >> when monitoring multiple CPUs at the same time.
> > >
> > >
> > > The record command does not analyze the events, it just copies from mmap to
> > > file in lumps per mmap. e.g., on a given round the perf data file has events
> > > like this:
> > >
> > >    111112223344444444555566666F111111111
> > >    |<------- round --------->|^
> > >                               |
> > >         finished round event -|
> > >
> > > where 11111 are events read from mmap1, 2222 are events from mmap2, etc. F
> > > is the finished round event which a pass over all mmaps has been done.
> > >
> > > So for mmap1 all of the 11111 events are in time order, then jumping to
> > > mmap2 events the 2222 times are time sorted relative to mmap2 but not
> > > relative to mmap1 events.
> > >
> > > The ordered events code sorts the clumps into a time based stream:
> > >     123141641445124564234645656...
> > >
> > In my case I care about time ordering the mmap records between themselves
> > because they overlap on the address range.
> 
> Right, Namhyung, do you keep all the MMAP records as well? Looking at
> the threaded patchkit I see:
> 
> -----------------
> [PATCH 23/38] perf tools: Add a test case for timed map groups handling
> 
> A test case for verifying thread->mg and ->mg_list handling during
> time change and new thread__find_addr_map_time() and friends.
> -----------------
> 
> You said:
> 
> Subject: [PATCH 19/37] perf tools: Introduce thread__find_addr_location_time() and friends
> 
> The *_time() variants are for find appropriate map (and symbol) at the
> given time.  This is based on the fact that map_groups list is sorted
> by time in the previous patch.
> ----------------
> 
> Running out of time here, but I couldn't find code where you keep
> 'struct map' that overlaps and that could then be looked up using
> timestamp in addition to the addr being looked up, that is needed for
> parallely process samples having first processed all PERF_RECORD_MMAP
> events.

It currently keeps only 'map_groups' per fork/exec so overlapped
'struct map' are not treated well assuming it's a rare event.  But
with the JIT map injection, it certainly also needs to keep 'struct
map' by timestamp - I'll work on it for the next spin.

Thanks,
Namhyung

  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-16  1:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-12  3:32 [BUG] perf report: ordered events and flushing bug Stephane Eranian
2015-03-12  7:57 ` Namhyung Kim
2015-03-12  9:02 ` Adrian Hunter
2015-03-12 19:05   ` Stephane Eranian
2015-03-12 19:13     ` David Ahern
2015-03-12 19:23       ` Stephane Eranian
2015-03-12 19:34         ` David Ahern
2015-03-12 19:39           ` Stephane Eranian
2015-03-12 19:53             ` David Ahern
2015-03-12 20:06               ` Stephane Eranian
2015-03-12 20:50                 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-03-16  1:11                   ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2015-03-12 20:16               ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-03-12 20:24                 ` Stephane Eranian
2015-03-12 20:27       ` Adrian Hunter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150316011116.GN943@sejong \
    --to=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.