All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Nicholas Miell <nmiell@comcast.net>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Alan Cox <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] sys_membarrier(): system/process-wide memory barrier (x86) (v12)
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 20:25:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150316032550.GA1110@thin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1426447459-28620-1-git-send-email-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>

On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 03:24:19PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> Here is an implementation of a new system call, sys_membarrier(), which
> executes a memory barrier on either all running threads of the current
> process (MEMBARRIER_PRIVATE_FLAG) or calls synchronize_sched() to issue
> a memory barrier on all threads running on the system. It can be used to
> distribute the cost of user-space memory barriers asymmetrically by
> transforming pairs of memory barriers into pairs consisting of
> sys_membarrier() and a compiler barrier. For synchronization primitives
> that distinguish between read-side and write-side (e.g. userspace RCU,
> rwlocks), the read-side can be accelerated significantly by moving the
> bulk of the memory barrier overhead to the write-side.

>From a quick review, this seems quite reasonable (as it did 5 years
ago).

One request: Could you please add a config option (default y) in the
EXPERT menu to disable this?  You actually seem to already have it
marked as a cond_syscall.

Also, a very minor nit: flags in kernel APIs aren't typically named with
a _FLAG suffix.

With the syscall made optional, and with or without that naming nit
fixed:
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>

- Josh Triplett

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-03-16  3:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-15 19:24 [RFC PATCH] sys_membarrier(): system/process-wide memory barrier (x86) (v12) Mathieu Desnoyers
2015-03-15 22:05 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-16  3:25 ` Josh Triplett [this message]
2015-03-16 13:00   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2015-03-16 14:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-16 14:24   ` Steven Rostedt
2015-03-16 15:49     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2015-03-16 15:49     ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-16 16:12       ` Steven Rostedt
2015-03-16 15:43   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2015-03-16 15:57     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2015-03-16 17:13     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-16 17:21     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-16 18:53       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2015-03-16 20:54         ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-17  1:45           ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2015-03-17  2:26             ` Steven Rostedt
2015-03-17  6:40               ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-17 11:44                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-17 14:10                   ` Steven Rostedt
2015-03-17 16:35                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-17 12:46               ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2015-03-18  1:06                 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-03-17  6:30             ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-17 11:56               ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-17 12:01                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-17 13:13               ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2015-03-17 16:36                 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2015-03-17 16:48                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-17 17:55                   ` josh
2015-03-17 16:37                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-17 16:49                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-17 17:00                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-16 17:24     ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150316032550.GA1110@thin \
    --to=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=nmiell@comcast.net \
    --cc=npiggin@kernel.dk \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.