From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next 0/8] netfilter: untangle bridge and bridge netfilter Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 14:47:46 +0100 Message-ID: <20150316134746.GA6701@salvia> References: <1425513160-496-1-git-send-email-fw@strlen.de> <20150309130253.GA6677@salvia> <20150309135910.GC1528@breakpoint.cc> <20150314090035.GA3561@salvia> <20150314111325.GG14761@breakpoint.cc> <20150316123854.GA5564@salvia> <20150316130110.GA1524@breakpoint.cc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Florian Westphal Return-path: Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:33718 "EHLO mail.us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750948AbbCPNnz (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Mar 2015 09:43:55 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150316130110.GA1524@breakpoint.cc> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 02:01:10PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote: > We can store ifindexes of physin/physout and re-lookup, sure. > > I'll start on the central storage infrastructure. > Do you want me to base it on the current patches i have or on plain > nf-next? Let me pick these first: [-next,v2] netfilter: bridge: query conntrack about skb dnat [-next,resend] netfilter: bridge: remove BRNF_STATE_BRIDGED flag This, I'll ping David to ack it: [v2,nf-next,1/6] net: untangle ip_fragment and bridge netfilter The follow up patches, you please rebase upon the central storage idea. I like your small state machine idea instead of playing with flags and the new functions that encapsulate the save/restore mangling to keep IP/bridge happy. Thanks.