From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Theodore Ts'o Subject: Re: [PATCH-v2 1/2] fs: make sure the timestamps for lazytime inodes eventually get written Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 11:53:36 -0400 Message-ID: <20150317155336.GB5663@thunk.org> References: <1426533260-3305-1-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu> <1426533260-3305-2-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu> <0ADB84CA-6F1D-41EC-A847-FCD5764FCAE9@dilger.ca> <20150317103337.GE23155@quack.suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Andreas Dilger , Linux Filesystem Development List , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, stable@vger.kernel.org To: Jan Kara Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150317103337.GE23155@quack.suse.cz> Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 11:33:37AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > Yes, something like this should be possible. But I wanted that to happen > as a separate patch once we have everything working correctly. The code is > subtle enough that I didn't want Ted to complicate it with further > optimizations initially. Yes, agreed, I took a closer look at it and making the change that Andreas suggested is more complicated than it first seems. We can try to fix this later, but it's definitely messy. - Ted