From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 19/20] XFS: allow follow_link to often succeed in RCU-walk.
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 13:37:40 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150323023740.8161.44210.stgit@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150323023258.8161.32467.stgit@notabene.brown>
If LOOKUP_RCU is set, use GFP_ATOMIC rather than GFP_KERNEL,
and try to get the ilock without blocking.
When these succeed, follow_link() can succeed without dropping
out of RCU-walk.
As xfs_readlink can now races with xfs_fs_evict_inode:
- xfs_readlink must check if the inode is being evicted after
getting the lock
- xfs_fs_evict_inode cannot assert that the lock is not held.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c | 2 +-
fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
fs/xfs/xfs_super.c | 2 --
fs/xfs/xfs_symlink.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
fs/xfs/xfs_symlink.h | 2 +-
5 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
index ac4feae45eb3..29d95a1b76c0 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
@@ -303,7 +303,7 @@ xfs_readlink_by_handle(
goto out_dput;
}
- error = xfs_readlink(XFS_I(dentry->d_inode), link);
+ error = xfs_readlink(XFS_I(dentry->d_inode), link, 0);
if (error)
goto out_kfree;
error = readlink_copy(hreq->ohandle, olen, link);
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
index c2c136ef3a50..631b1ec2e650 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
@@ -416,15 +416,20 @@ xfs_vn_follow_link(
int flags)
{
char *link;
- int error = -ENOMEM;
+ int error;
- if (flags & LOOKUP_RCU)
- return ERR_PTR(-ECHILD);
- link = kmalloc(MAXPATHLEN+1, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (flags & LOOKUP_RCU) {
+ error = -ECHILD;
+ link = kmalloc(MAXPATHLEN+1, GFP_ATOMIC);
+ } else {
+ error = -ENOMEM;
+ link = kmalloc(MAXPATHLEN+1, GFP_KERNEL);
+ }
if (!link)
goto out_err;
- error = xfs_readlink(XFS_I(inode), link);
+ error = xfs_readlink(XFS_I(inode), link,
+ flags & LOOKUP_RCU);
if (unlikely(error))
goto out_kfree;
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
index 3827be14383c..e041fa55912b 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
@@ -996,8 +996,6 @@ xfs_fs_evict_inode(
{
xfs_inode_t *ip = XFS_I(inode);
- ASSERT(!rwsem_is_locked(&ip->i_iolock.mr_lock));
-
trace_xfs_evict_inode(ip);
truncate_inode_pages_final(&inode->i_data);
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_symlink.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_symlink.c
index 25791df6f638..228987b8e758 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_symlink.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_symlink.c
@@ -123,7 +123,8 @@ xfs_readlink_bmap(
int
xfs_readlink(
struct xfs_inode *ip,
- char *link)
+ char *link,
+ int rcu)
{
struct xfs_mount *mp = ip->i_mount;
xfs_fsize_t pathlen;
@@ -134,7 +135,15 @@ xfs_readlink(
if (XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(mp))
return -EIO;
- xfs_ilock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_SHARED);
+ if (rcu) {
+ if (xfs_ilock_nowait(ip, XFS_ILOCK_SHARED) == 0)
+ return -ECHILD;
+ if (ip->i_vnode.i_state & (I_FREEING | I_CLEAR)) {
+ xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
+ return -ECHILD;
+ }
+ } else
+ xfs_ilock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_SHARED);
pathlen = ip->i_d.di_size;
if (!pathlen)
@@ -153,6 +162,8 @@ xfs_readlink(
if (ip->i_df.if_flags & XFS_IFINLINE) {
memcpy(link, ip->i_df.if_u1.if_data, pathlen);
link[pathlen] = '\0';
+ } else if (rcu) {
+ error = -ECHILD;
} else {
error = xfs_readlink_bmap(ip, link);
}
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_symlink.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_symlink.h
index e75245d09116..a71d26643e20 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_symlink.h
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_symlink.h
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
int xfs_symlink(struct xfs_inode *dp, struct xfs_name *link_name,
const char *target_path, umode_t mode, struct xfs_inode **ipp);
-int xfs_readlink(struct xfs_inode *ip, char *link);
+int xfs_readlink(struct xfs_inode *ip, char *link, int rcu);
int xfs_inactive_symlink(struct xfs_inode *ip);
#endif /* __XFS_SYMLINK_H */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-23 2:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-23 2:37 [PATCH 00/20] Support follow_link in RCU-walk - V3 NeilBrown
2015-03-23 2:37 ` [PATCH 01/20] Documentation: remove outdated information from automount-support.txt NeilBrown
2015-03-23 2:37 ` [PATCH 03/20] VFS: replace {, total_}link_count in task_struct with pointer to nameidata NeilBrown
2015-03-23 2:37 ` [PATCH 02/20] STAGING/lustre: limit follow_link recursion using stack space NeilBrown
2015-04-18 3:01 ` Al Viro
2015-04-19 20:57 ` Andreas Dilger
2015-04-19 21:33 ` Al Viro
2015-04-20 2:29 ` Al Viro
2015-03-23 2:37 ` [PATCH 04/20] ovl: rearrange ovl_follow_link to it doesn't need to call ->put_link NeilBrown
2015-03-23 2:37 ` [PATCH 06/20] SECURITY: remove nameidata arg from inode_follow_link NeilBrown
2015-03-23 2:37 ` [PATCH 11/20] VFS/namei: use terminate_walk when symlink lookup fails NeilBrown
2015-03-23 2:37 ` [PATCH 05/20] VFS: replace nameidata arg to ->put_link with a char* NeilBrown
2015-03-23 2:37 ` [PATCH 09/20] security/selinux: pass 'flags' arg to avc_audit() and avc_has_perm_flags() NeilBrown
2015-03-23 2:37 ` [PATCH 08/20] VFS: make all ->follow_link handlers aware for LOOKUP_RCU NeilBrown
2015-03-23 2:37 ` [PATCH 10/20] security: make inode_follow_link RCU-walk aware NeilBrown
2015-03-23 2:37 ` [PATCH 07/20] VFS: remove nameidata args from ->follow_link NeilBrown
2015-03-23 2:37 ` [PATCH 14/20] VFS/namei: add 'inode' arg to put_link() NeilBrown
2015-04-17 16:25 ` Al Viro
2015-04-17 19:09 ` Al Viro
2015-04-18 8:09 ` Al Viro
2015-03-23 2:37 ` [PATCH 12/20] VFS/namei: new flag to support RCU symlinks: LOOKUP_LINK_RCU NeilBrown
2015-03-23 2:37 ` [PATCH 15/20] VFS/namei: enhance follow_link to support RCU-walk NeilBrown
2015-03-23 2:37 ` [PATCH 18/20] xfs: use RCU to free 'struct xfs_mount' NeilBrown
2015-03-23 2:37 ` [PATCH 16/20] VFS/namei: enable RCU-walk when following symlinks NeilBrown
2015-03-23 2:37 ` [PATCH 17/20] VFS/namei: handle LOOKUP_RCU in page_follow_link_light NeilBrown
2015-03-23 2:37 ` [PATCH 13/20] VFS/namei: abort RCU-walk on symlink if atime needs updating NeilBrown
2015-03-23 2:37 ` [PATCH 20/20] NFS: support LOOKUP_RCU in nfs_follow_link NeilBrown
2015-03-23 2:37 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2015-03-25 23:23 ` [PATCH 00/20] Support follow_link in RCU-walk - V3 NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150323023740.8161.44210.stgit@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.