From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752613AbbCWRQ3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Mar 2015 13:16:29 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:55385 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752120AbbCWRQ1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Mar 2015 13:16:27 -0400 Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 18:14:44 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Denys Vlasenko Cc: Steven Rostedt , Andy Lutomirski , Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Oleg Nesterov , Frederic Weisbecker , Alexei Starovoitov , Will Drewry , Kees Cook , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: stop using PER_CPU_VAR(kernel_stack) Message-ID: <20150323171443.GA3880@pd.tnic> References: <1426970678-600-1-git-send-email-dvlasenk@redhat.com> <20150323101815.35bd61c7@gandalf.local.home> <551048E9.6060800@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <551048E9.6060800@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 06:10:01PM +0100, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > We want to get rid of kernel_stack, since it is redundant: > in 64-bits, PER_CPU_VAR(cpu_tss + TSS_sp0) can be used instead, > in 32-bits, PER_CPU_VAR(cpu_current_top_of_stack) can be used instead. We probably should have a macro unifying those on both bitness. Especially 64-bit is really non-telling - I can't really deduce from "cpu_tss + TSS_sp0" that it is the kernel stack ptr. Thanks. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply. --